On tirsdag 03 mai 2005, 00:40, Michael Schout wrote:
> Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> > It is possible that the FOR UPDATE is spurious. It signals to the
> > database system that this transaction intends to write that row.
> > With PostgreSQL's MVCC transaction isolation system, it's probably
> > not
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> It is possible that the FOR UPDATE is spurious. It signals to the
> database system that this transaction intends to write that row. With
> PostgreSQL's MVCC transaction isolation system, it's probably not
> necessary and may be causing problems.
It definately *is* nec
