Clinton Gormley wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 13:45 -0400, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 5:02 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I'm under the impression that this is the same as SELinux
(http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/info/faq.cfm)
SELinux is at the kernel level + a few libraries, and fr
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 13:45 -0400, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2006, at 5:02 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> > I'm under the impression that this is the same as SELinux
> > (http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/info/faq.cfm)
>
> SELinux is at the kernel level + a few libraries, and from what i
>
On Apr 9, 2006, at 5:02 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I'm under the impression that this is the same as SELinux
(http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/info/faq.cfm)
SELinux is at the kernel level + a few libraries, and from what i
read appArmor is just a library
I'm under the impression that this is the same as SELinux
(http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/info/faq.cfm)
Regards,
KAM
I was just at cansecwest (http://cansecwest.com/) here in Vancouver, and
went to a talk by Crispin Cowan from Novell. He presented AppArmor which
confines the application into a r
I was just at cansecwest (http://cansecwest.com/) here in Vancouver, and
went to a talk by Crispin Cowan from Novell. He presented AppArmor which
confines the application into a restricted mode (which files it can access
and what it can and cannot do). Unlike jail/chroot AppArmor allows you to
