Re: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

2014-10-07 Thread Mathieu Simon
Hi Richard Am 07.10.2014 um 14:59 schrieb Kandarian, Richard Mansfield: I don't remember it being very difficult to build Perl with VC. I've attached the essentials. (Though I don't know whether/how the list handles attachments...) Yes, it isn't once you learn about the different toolchains th

RE: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

2014-10-07 Thread Kandarian, Richard Mansfield
--Original Message- > From: Mathieu Simon [mailto:mathieu@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 10:57 PM > To: modperl@perl.apache.org > Subject: Re: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4 > > (and now forwarded to the list) > > Hi > > Am 06.10.

Re: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

2014-10-06 Thread Mathieu Simon
(and now forwarded to the list) Hi Am 06.10.2014 um 18:54 schrieb Steve Hay: You need to build perl yourself using VC/nmake too or else find some other binary build using VC/nmake because ActivePerl actually uses gcc/dmake just like Strawberry Perl these days... *Ouch*, I didn't realize. Build

Re: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

2014-10-06 Thread Steve Hay
You need to build perl yourself using VC/nmake too or else find some other binary build using VC/nmake because ActivePerl actually uses gcc/dmake just like Strawberry Perl these days... On 6 October 2014 15:23, Mathieu Simon wrote: > Hi > > 2014-10-02 10:27 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Simon : >>> >>> >> Ah

Re: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

2014-10-06 Thread Mathieu Simon
Hi Richard That sounds interesting - the most time I've spent installing GB's of Windows developer tools. Compiling all from scratch (I tried it a bit, but also failed - guess: PEBKAC) wasn't in the scope, so I'd really like to give that download a test, unfortunately the link doesn't work "Please

RE: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

2014-10-06 Thread Kandarian, Richard Mansfield
il.com] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 8:23 AM To: modperl@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4 Hi 2014-10-02 10:27 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Simon mailto:mathieu@gmail.com>>: Aha, so I guess a Visual Studio is required then? Let me give it a whirl then. :-)

Re: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

2014-10-06 Thread Mathieu Simon
Hi 2014-10-02 10:27 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Simon : > >> Aha, so I guess a Visual Studio is required then? > Let me give it a whirl then. :-) > So I had the oppoortunity to give this a bit a test and from what I looks now the situation is a bit in dare state for building mod_perl for httpd 2.4.x on Win

Re: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

2014-10-02 Thread Mathieu Simon
Hey Steve and list Thanks 2014-10-02 10:16 GMT+02:00 Steve Hay : > > I'm not familiar with XAMPP, but I don't believe you can currently > build mod_perl with Strawberry Perl because mod_perl doesn't support > building with dmake. > Aha, so I guess a Visual Studio is required then? Let me give it

Re: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

2014-10-02 Thread Steve Hay
On 2 October 2014 08:26, Mathieu Simon wrote: > Dear List > > For whatever reason I wanted (and also would have a certain need) to build > mod_perl > to work with Apache 2.4 on Windows. ;-) > > I've tried building 2.0.9-dev (master r1624218) with XAMPP 1.8.3 's (httpd > 2.4.10) with several Strawb

Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4

2014-10-02 Thread Mathieu Simon
Dear List For whatever reason I wanted (and also would have a certain need) to build mod_perl to work with Apache 2.4 on Windows. ;-) I've tried building 2.0.9-dev (master r1624218) with XAMPP 1.8.3 's (httpd 2.4.10) with several Strawberry Perl (portable) version and always fail with the same er