How about the filter and scope support?
I wonder if the filter and scope support might be more appropriate in
the authz handler... What do you all think?
--
Shannon Eric Peevey => "speeves"
Dyno-Mite! System Administrator => [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Central Web Support
Nick Urbanik wrote:
How about the filter and scope support?
Is the documentation okay?
I haven't had a chance to look at it in depth, but I'll let you know
when I do.
thanks again :)
--
Shannon Eric Peevey => "speeves"
Dyno-Mite! System Administrator => [EMAIL
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 07:11:35PM -0600, Shannon Eric Peevey wrote:
> Nick Urbanik wrote:
>
> >Dear Folks,
> >
> >Sorry, GPG munged the patch.
> >Here is an unmunged patch.
> >Is this the right place to send it?
> >
> >
> Yes, thanks! I was just getting ready to implement ldaps support in it,
Nick Urbanik wrote:
Dear Folks,
Sorry, GPG munged the patch.
Here is an unmunged patch.
Is this the right place to send it?
Yes, thanks! I was just getting ready to implement ldaps support in it,
but you beat me to the punch. You can expect the next version to be out
during the next month.
Dear Folks,
Sorry, GPG munged the patch.
Here is an unmunged patch.
Is this the right place to send it?
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 06:44:00PM +0800, Nick Urbanik wrote:
> Oh dear, Some twit forgot to attach the patch!
>
> Here it is.
>
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:38:33AM +, Nick Urbanik wrote
Oh dear, Some twit forgot to attach the patch!
Here it is.
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:38:33AM +, Nick Urbanik wrote:
> Dear Folks,
> I use LDAP authentication a lot here at our Institute, and with
> mod_auth_ldap coming and going in Red Hat (here before RH 8, gone in
> RH 8 and 8, back in Fed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Folks,
I use LDAP authentication a lot here at our Institute, and with
mod_auth_ldap coming and going in Red Hat (here before RH 8, gone in
RH 8 and 8, back in Fedora, but gone in RH enterprise 3...), I
realised that Perl is the way to keep my san
