Re: Setting HTTP-STATUS and Filters

2006-03-22 Thread Tom Schindl
So I propose the following documentation patch many people may not grasp that they need to look into the sources to find out that their filter will always return HTTP-Status OK to their clients although they return SERVER_ERROR ;-) Tom Geoffrey Young wrote: > > Tom Schindl wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>s

Re: Setting HTTP-STATUS and Filters

2006-03-22 Thread Tom Schindl
Well I figured out that the test I was running was on an old version of mod_perl. I'll give it a try on the 2.0.2-release as fast as possible from the code it looks like 2.0.2 doesn't return OK in this situation. Tom Tom Schindl wrote: > Geoffrey Young wrote: > >>Tom Schindl wrote: >> >> >>>Hi,

Re: Setting HTTP-STATUS and Filters

2006-03-22 Thread Tom Schindl
Geoffrey Young wrote: > > Tom Schindl wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>solved it myself $f->r->status() how stupid I haven't seen this before, >>works like a charme but one more question, what is a filter supposed to >>return on ERROR why does one have to set the status one self and return >>Apache2::Const::S

Re: Setting HTTP-STATUS and Filters

2006-03-22 Thread Geoffrey Young
Tom Schindl wrote: > Hi, > > solved it myself $f->r->status() how stupid I haven't seen this before, > works like a charme but one more question, what is a filter supposed to > return on ERROR why does one have to set the status one self and return > Apache2::Const::SERVER_ERROR from the filter

Re: Setting HTTP-STATUS and Filters

2006-03-18 Thread Tom Schindl
Hi, solved it myself $f->r->status() how stupid I haven't seen this before, works like a charme but one more question, what is a filter supposed to return on ERROR why does one have to set the status one self and return Apache2::Const::SERVER_ERROR from the filter handller isn't setting the reques