Re: bug with mod_perl and CGI.pm

2004-05-01 Thread Stas Bekman
Lincoln Stein wrote: Hi Stas, Thanks for the advice. By the way, I'm currently moving all my mod_perl 1.X modules to 2.X, using the Apache::MP3 port you did a year ago as my guide. Thanks for the help! You're welcome, Lincoln :) BTW, the whole process is documented here: http://perl.apache.or

Re: bug with mod_perl and CGI.pm

2004-05-01 Thread Lincoln Stein
Hi Stas, Thanks for the advice. By the way, I'm currently moving all my mod_perl 1.X modules to 2.X, using the Apache::MP3 port you did a year ago as my guide. Thanks for the help! Lincoln On Saturday 01 May 2004 01:12 pm, Stas Bekman wrote: > Lincoln Stein wrote: > > Hi Lan, > > > > Do you

Re: bug with mod_perl and CGI.pm

2004-05-01 Thread Stas Bekman
Lincoln Stein wrote: Hi Lan, Do you think this might be a bug in mod_perl 1.99X? It is the responsibility of mod_perl's CGI compatibility mode to set the CGI environment variables. It doesn't look as though CGI.pm ever tries to set CONTENT_LENGTH itself, even when running under mod_perl, but

Re: bug with mod_perl and CGI.pm

2004-05-01 Thread Lincoln Stein
Hi Lan, Do you think this might be a bug in mod_perl 1.99X? It is the responsibility of mod_perl's CGI compatibility mode to set the CGI environment variables. It doesn't look as though CGI.pm ever tries to set CONTENT_LENGTH itself, even when running under mod_perl, but relies on mod_perl t