Vulnerability ?

2009-05-06 Thread Francois Pernet
Hi, We have received the following vulnerability report: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23192/info I read the changes for the mod_perl versions but did not find anything really clear. We are using mod_perl version 2.0.3 compiled for Suse linux enterprise server 10 sp2 used with apache 2.0

Re: Vulnerability ?

2009-05-06 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Francois Pernet francois.per...@idsa.chwrote: Hi, We have received the following vulnerability report: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23192/info I read the changes for the mod_perl versions but did not find anything really clear. We are using mod_perl

Re: Vulnerability ?

2009-05-06 Thread Perrin Harkins
For mod_perl 2 users, this only affects you if you use ModPerl::PerlRun or ModPerl::Registry. - Perrin On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Francois Pernet francois.per...@idsa.ch wrote: Hi, We have received the following vulnerability report: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23192/info I read

Re: [SECURITY] [CVE-2009-0796] Vulnerability found in Apache::Status and Apache2::Status

2009-04-07 Thread Fred Moyer
Update - I fat fingered the CVE number in this email body previously (but it was correct in the subject). The correct vulnerability reference number is CVE-2009-0796. On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Fred Moyer f...@redhotpenguin.com wrote: mod_perl lists, A specific vulnerability [CVE-2009

[SECURITY] [CVE-2009-0796] Vulnerability found in Apache::Status and Apache2::Status

2009-04-01 Thread Fred Moyer
mod_perl lists, A specific vulnerability [CVE-2009-0795] in Apache::Status and Apache2::Status has been discovered which may affect the security of your mod_perl installation. Running Apache::Status on a public server with no protection has always been a bad idea though, vulnerability