On 4/13/07, Jonathan Swartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It doesn't seem worth the risk, especially if
GracefulStopTimeout is only 1 second. The server will be unable to respond
for a second longer, but most load balancers should be able to react quickly
to that. (I think).
I would definitely set
on_a_Live_Production_Server)
> > recommends using regular old stop. Doesn't this terminate any current
> > user requests, with ugly results on the client? Wouldn't it make more
> > sense to issue a graceful stop signal, setting
> > GracefulShutdownTimeout to a low number (like
urrent
user requests, with ugly results on the client? Wouldn't it make more
sense to issue a graceful stop signal, setting
GracefulShutdownTimeout to a low number (like 1) and then sleeping
for at least that number of seconds?
Yes. The reason the docs don't suggest that is that this is a new
I'm wondering if anyone uses Apache's graceful stop feature (http://
httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/stopping.html#gracefulstop) with mod_perl
servers.
The mod_perl guide section on starting and stopping (http://
perl.apache.org/docs/general/control/
co
