On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:31:30 -0200 (EDT), Sergio Salvi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Run perl -V on both hosts and check if there are any differences
between the output, mainly on Platform and Compile-time options sections.
Also, you could create a simple perl script (like $x++ for (1..100))
Hi,
Recently I've upgraded one of our mod_perl servers to Fedora Core 3
(the others are all running Fedora Core 1).
What I've found is that the Fedora Core 3 machine is consistently
slower to respond than the Fedora Core 1 machines:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# for f in web1 web2 web3 web4; do
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alex Greg writes:
We're using the Fedora Perl packages (perl-5.8.3-16 on FC1,
perl-5.8.5-9 on FC3), but I have compiled Apache and mod_perl on all
the machines from source, with the following command:
If you build your own Perl from source, you can remove the
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:15:27 +
Alex Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Recently I've upgraded one of our mod_perl servers to Fedora Core 3
(the others are all running Fedora Core 1).
What I've found is that the Fedora Core 3 machine is consistently
slower to respond than the Fedora
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:40 -0600, Frank Wiles wrote:
While I agree recompling Perl will help, you might also look into
whether or not SELinux is slowing you down.
How can you tell, and what can you do about it? Any specific info would
be greatly appreciated.
Regarding recompiling perl,
Sorry for butting in here but you have piqued my curiosity. Is it
better to do a minimal install of RHAS and build up from there with
source or should I use what ships and just add to it.
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:40 -0600, Frank Wiles wrote:
While I agree recompling Perl will
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:56:11 -0500
Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:40 -0600, Frank Wiles wrote:
While I agree recompling Perl will help, you might also look into
whether or not SELinux is slowing you down.
How can you tell, and what can you do about
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Perrin Harkins wr
ites:
How can you tell, and what can you do about it? Any specific info would
be greatly appreciated.
OS issues might be best pinpointed by benchmarking the two httpd's on the
two Fedora's but w/o modperl loaded.
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:01:35 -0700
John D. Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for butting in here but you have piqued my curiosity. Is it
better to do a minimal install of RHAS and build up from there with
source or should I use what ships and just add to it.
This is starting to get
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:40:01 -0600, Frank Wiles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:15:27 +
Alex Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Recently I've upgraded one of our mod_perl servers to Fedora Core 3
(the others are all running Fedora Core 1).
What I've found is
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 19:35 +, Alex Greg wrote:
Any further advice would be appreciated, before I take the next step
and compile my own Perl.
The final variable here is the kernel. There may be something about the
kernel differences between the releases that favors apache's process
model.
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:01 -0700, John D. Sanders wrote:
Sorry for butting in here but you have piqued my curiosity. Is it
better to do a minimal install of RHAS and build up from there with
source or should I use what ships and just add to it.
The way you do it depends on your local admin
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:40:20 -0500, Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 19:35 +, Alex Greg wrote:
Any further advice would be appreciated, before I take the next step
and compile my own Perl.
The final variable here is the kernel. There may be something about
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:47:54 -0500
Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe it would be cool to make an FC3 RPM of Perl built with the best
options that installs into a non-conflicting location available for
download. Hmmm, if it was compiled with Intel's compiler for a little
more
Why are you using Apache1.3?
Have tried compiling Apache2 with MP2?
With FC3 and SElinux threads are more prevalent. I thought thats why I
was upgrading to Apache2. Use of better threading technology.
On Thursday 06 January 2005 10:15 am, Alex Greg wrote:
Hi,
Recently I've upgraded one
15 matches
Mail list logo
