Foo JH wrote:
3. Fast to cook, good to eat
That's my favorite part of mod_perl.
It goes down well with cookies, too, but tastes awful with Java. ;)
And, you know, to keep this on topic, I like the idea that mod_perl on
Windows can be a springboard of sorts for people who may eventually be
With thread support in mod_perl 2, it's much more of an option on Win32
than with mod_perl 1, so you might even see more interest from the
Windows side.
Foo JH wrote:
Looking at the (albeit small) stream of entries to the mailing list, I'm
actually quite happy to notice that people are:
1.
On Dec 6, 2007 10:38 AM, Foo JH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the (albeit small) stream of entries to the mailing list, I'm
actually quite happy to notice that people are:
1. Still using modperl. Some newbie questions may suggest fresh blood...
2. Still using modperl on Win32 (despite
Firstly: mod_perl is a good choice. :) There are other languages out
there which can probably do the same job 90% of the time. But what you
have chosen is a language that is:
1. OS independent
2. Highly extensible via CPAN
3. Fast to cook, good to eat
It's not a question of whether you can do
Looking at the (albeit small) stream of entries to the mailing list, I'm
actually quite happy to notice that people are:
1. Still using modperl. Some newbie questions may suggest fresh blood...
2. Still using modperl on Win32 (despite the 'limitations'). Good news
for Microsoft, but I
