Re: session module

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Lon Koenig wrote: > Are these susceptible to the cleartext cookie silliness exposed by FireSheep? Well, Apache::Session doesn't handle cookies at all, so it's entirely up to you how you want to deal with it, and CGI::Session doesn't dictate whether or not your sit

Re: session module

Haven't used any of the popular session modules in awhile. Are these susceptible to the cleartext cookie silliness exposed by FireSheep? "Great Artists Ship" Lon Koenig l...@schnoggo.com http://lonk.me On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Jeff Pang wrote: > 于 2010-10-2

Re: session module

--- On Fri, 10/29/10, Fayland Lam wrote: > try Dancer. which is very suitable > for small application. just one file. One file containing: """ use Dancer::Config; use Dancer::FileUtils; use Dancer::GetOpt; use Dancer::Error; use Dancer::Helpers; use Dancer::Logger; use Dancer::Plugin; use Dancer:

Re: session module

于 2010-10-29 20:42, Fayland Lam 写道: try Dancer. which is very suitable for small application. just one file. Ok I will check out it. I first time knew Dancer from ruby 2 years ago. Never know that there is a perl execution of that.

Re: session module

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Jeff Pang wrote: > I know CGI::Session well. > But have been thinking does Apache::Session get better performance under > modperl? I haven't measured it, but I doubt there's any significant performance difference. Don't be fooled by the "CGI" in CGI::Session. -

Re: session module

try Dancer. which is very suitable for small application. just one file. Thanks On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Jeff Pang wrote: > 于 2010-10-29 20:28, Fayland Lam 写道: >> >> try a framework. that's much more popular. :) >> > > I wrote a small application with few scripts. > A framework like cata

Re: session module

于 2010-10-29 20:20, Perrin Harkins 写道: Both work. CGI::Session was better maintained for a while but it looks like Apache::Session has been updated recently. Pick the one that you find easiest to understand from the documentation. I know CGI::Session well. But have been thinking does Apache:

Re: session module

于 2010-10-29 20:28, Fayland Lam 写道: try a framework. that's much more popular. :) I wrote a small application with few scripts. A framework like catalyst is too large to use for me. Thanks. Jeff.

Re: session module

try a framework. that's much more popular. :) On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote: > Both work.  CGI::Session was better maintained for a while but it > looks like Apache::Session has been updated recently.  Pick the one > that you find easiest to understand from the documentati

Re: session module

Both work. CGI::Session was better maintained for a while but it looks like Apache::Session has been updated recently. Pick the one that you find easiest to understand from the documentation. - Perrin 2010/10/29 Jeff Pang : > is Apache::Session or CGI::Session better for mod_perl? > > Thanks. >

session module

is Apache::Session or CGI::Session better for mod_perl? Thanks.