Re: t/apr-ext/*.t all fail

2006-07-24 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Patrick Rutkowski wrote: t/apr-ext/brigade.../home/rutski89/opt/perl/bin/perl:/home/rutski89/opt/kit/mod_perl-2.0.2/blib/arch/auto/APR/Pool/Pool.so: undefined symbol 'apr_pool_cleanup_null' I'm recently (as of today) in a position to trouble shoot this NetBSD 3.0

Re: t/apr-ext/*.t all fail

2006-06-24 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Patrick M. Rutkowski wrote: Are the apr-ext tests even that important? The reguard apr test do pass. Is mod_perl considered not safe to use because of the apr-ext test failures? From the looks of it, looks like its a test suite problem. You always try to do one of the things the tests do from a

Re: t/apr-ext/*.t all fail

2006-06-22 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Patrick Rutkowski wrote: Are the t/apr-ext/*.t tests supposed to fail? No matter how hard to try I always get this on OpenBSD 3.9 with perl 5.8.8, Apache-2.2.2 and mod_perl-2: I think its due a lack of testing on openbsd. I don't think any of the developers have an openbsd box handy. I do

t/apr-ext/*.t all fail

2006-06-17 Thread Patrick Rutkowski
Are the t/apr-ext/*.t tests supposed to fail? No matter how hard to try I always get this on OpenBSD 3.9 with perl 5.8.8, Apache-2.2.2 and mod_perl-2: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed