undefined routines mod_dbd

2007-01-30 Thread Garnier, Jeremie
Hi all, I try to make this: use Apache2::Module (); # test if an Apache module is loaded if (Apache2::Module::loaded('mod_dbd.c')) { ... } But it dones: Undefined subroutine Apache2::Module::loaded call at... So why does it not work?? It is possible with mod_perl to access to

Re: undefined routines mod_dbd

2007-01-30 Thread Robert Landrum
Garnier, Jeremie wrote: use Apache2::Module (); # test if an Apache module is loaded if (Apache2::Module::loaded('mod_dbd.c')) { … } But it dones: Undefined subroutine Apache2::Module::loaded call at… I suspect that this may be because you're not actually running in mod_perl.

RE: undefined routines mod_dbd

2007-01-30 Thread Garnier, Jeremie
Sorry, i twas just an error in my httpd.conf. Can I access to mod_dbd function with the mod_perl? Thanks Jérémie -Message d'origine- De : Robert Landrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mardi 30 janvier 2007 17:46 À : Garnier, Jeremie Cc : Modperl@perl.apache.org Objet : Re: undefined

ANNOUNCE: HTML::Template v2.9

2007-01-30 Thread Sam Tregar
CHANGES - New Feature: the force_untaint option makes sure you do not pass tainted values to param(). [Sven Neuhaus] - New Feature: Added ESCAPE=none as a synonym for ESCAPE=0. Fixed both to work with default_escape. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Bug Fix: DEFAULT didn't work with URL

Re: file descriptor for client socket?

2007-01-30 Thread Daniel Risacher
I determined empirically that the file descriptor of the client socket is always 0 in my environment. I assume this is only true for the Prefork MPM. For the curious, the code I developed is for a Comet/pushlet type server. Looks like this: --- Handoff.pm --- package Handoff; use strict;

Re: undefined routines mod_dbd

2007-01-30 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Robert Landrum wrote: I suspect that this may be because you're not actually running in mod_perl. Aside from that, I don't see any methods actually defined in Apache2::Module::loaded... not even a bootstrap. So it might need to be loaded from something like Apache2. mod_dbd is not yet

Re: Apache::Session::MySQL, light/heavy proxy, wedging

2007-01-30 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
On Jan 30, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Todd Finney wrote: I have two servers running in the light/heavy configuration as outlined in the guide. Both servers are 1.3.34. On the lightweight server, my proxy section looks like this: first off, you should be running 2.0.x by now try this: my

What is the best way

2007-01-30 Thread Tracy12
Hi, Within a perl Authentication hanlder what is the best way to preserve the REMOTE_USER value and forward to the same but modified internal URL (without some query parameters). for eg. htttp://localhost/private?MYTEMP=4 I want to remove MYTEMP=4 and forward to htttp://localhost/private

Re: Apache::Session::MySQL, light/heavy proxy, wedging

2007-01-30 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
On Jan 30, 2007, at 6:44 PM, Todd Finney wrote: The bigger, fancier test case checks all of that. ok. great. sorry for assuming you didn't have that already -- just have to be sure. What I posted was a simplified test case, in order to demonstrate the problem in as few lines of code

Re: Apache::Session::MySQL, light/heavy proxy, wedging

2007-01-30 Thread Perrin Harkins
On 1/30/07, Todd Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - When I fire up a new browser and access http://192.168.0.4/, the browser hangs. In my bigger fancier handler with more detailed logging, it seems to hang right before the session tie. Any time that Apache::Session hangs, it's because of the

Re: ANNOUNCE: HTML::Template v2.9

2007-01-30 Thread Foo JH
Just want to comment that I enjoy using HTML::Template. :) Sam Tregar wrote: CHANGES - New Feature: the force_untaint option makes sure you do not pass tainted values to param(). [Sven Neuhaus] - New Feature: Added ESCAPE=none as a synonym for ESCAPE=0. Fixed both to work with

Re: Apache::Session::MySQL, light/heavy proxy, wedging

2007-01-30 Thread Perrin Harkins
On 1/30/07, Todd Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The sessions are modified on every request, to set a last_access time, and they're modified on login to set an authentication token. I can't think of circumstances under which two different requests would attempt to modify a given session at the