Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/lib/ModPerl Code.pm

2000-04-14 Thread Bill Moseley
At 11:56 AM 04/14/00 +0300, Stas Bekman wrote: sticking to the convention of single quoting constant strings Why? You lose the interpolation feature when you need it and you get to the awkward statement like this: -print $h_fh "\n#define ", +print $h_fh "\n", '#define

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/lib/ModPerl Code.pm

2000-04-14 Thread Doug MacEachern
Orwant and friends in "Algorithms with Perl" page 28 claims the first form is slower. faster to *parse*, not faster to *run*. stas, your benchmarks don't test parse time. It seems that TIMTOWTDI is going to die soon as everybody tells me that I should code as shown in "OO Perl" and

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/lib/ModPerl Code.pm

2000-04-14 Thread Stas Bekman
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote: Orwant and friends in "Algorithms with Perl" page 28 claims the first form is slower. faster to *parse*, not faster to *run*. stas, your benchmarks don't test parse time. It seems that TIMTOWTDI is going to die soon as everybody tells

cvs commit: modperl-2.0/lib/Apache .cvsignore

2000-04-14 Thread dougm
dougm 00/04/14 16:29:46 Added: lib/Apache .cvsignore Log: ignore Revision ChangesPath 1.1 modperl-2.0/lib/Apache/.cvsignore Index: .cvsignore === BuildConfig.pm