RE: cvs commit: modperl/src/modules/perl mod_perl.h perl_config.c

On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > pardon my being away, but does this mean that the earlier (possible) fix > > Apache::ModuleConfig->get($r, __PACKAGE__) > > was not the cause of the error, or that it was and the __PACKAGE__ part is > not necessary now? no, it was not the cause of t

cvs commit: modperl-site distributions.html

sbekman 00/09/25 14:40:43 Modified:.distributions.html Log: ppm info by Randy Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +14 -0 modperl-site/distributions.html Index: distributions.html === RCS file

cvs commit: modperl-site distributions.html

sbekman 00/09/25 14:42:25 Modified:.distributions.html Log: ppm info by Randy/ better formatting Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +1 -3 modperl-site/distributions.html Index: distributions.html ===

RE: cvs commit: modperl/src/modules/perl mod_perl.h perl_config.c

pardon my being away, but does this mean that the earlier (possible) fix Apache::ModuleConfig->get($r, __PACKAGE__) was not the cause of the error, or that it was and the __PACKAGE__ part is not necessary now? I was wondering whether to fix my calls for people who weren't up to cvs speed... --