dougm 01/11/14 19:03:22
Added: t/response/TestModperl env.pm
Log:
add test for tie of %ENV to r->subprocess_env
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 modperl-2.0/t/response/TestModperl/env.pm
Index: env.pm
==
dougm 01/11/14 19:02:43
Modified:src/modules/perl mod_perl.c modperl_env.c modperl_env.h
t/conf modperl_extra.pl
t/modperl .cvsignore
Log:
more complete implementation of tie %ENV to r->subprocess_env
Revision ChangesPath
1.95 +2 -7
dougm 01/11/14 17:30:46
Modified:src/modules/perl mod_perl.c
Log:
save globals before populating %ENV vars
Revision ChangesPath
1.94 +2 -2 modperl-2.0/src/modules/perl/mod_perl.c
Index: mod_perl.c
===
dougm 01/11/14 17:25:00
Modified:src/modules/perl modperl_perl_global.c
Log:
propagate SvMAGIC of original HV in modperl_perl_global_gvhv_save()
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +7 -0 modperl-2.0/src/modules/perl/modperl_perl_global.c
Index: modperl_perl_global
> What about an additional requirement:
>
> The site should be validated sucessfully by validator.w3.org
Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart...
Once there is a design that people are satisfied with, you are more than
welcome to submit patches to fix validation problem
On Tuesday 13 November 2001 11:57, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 01:31:52AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > Obviously the site should be very light on graphics, but since you are
> > a good web designer you know this and all the other requirements
> > already. The only req
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 01:31:52AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Obviously the site should be very light on graphics, but since you are
> a good web designer you know this and all the other requirements
> already. The only requirement we have is that this is an information
> site, so avoid fanc