On Fri, 12 May 2000, brian moseley wrote:
> > The only concern is to have all the pages designed in
> > the same way and not only the the front page. Hmm, at
> > least to arrange a link back to the front page :)
>
> yah, i think he originally wanted to make sure folks were
> happy with the desi
> I'm sorry I lost my English somewhere, I type words but somehow they don't
> get connected into sentences. Something is wrong with me :(
happens to me too :)
> Let's try again:
>
> The only concern is to have all the pages designed in the same way and not
> only the the front page. Hmm, at
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
> The only concern is to have all the pages designed in
> the same way and not only the the front page. Hmm, at
> least to arrange a link back to the front page :)
yah, i think he originally wanted to make sure folks were
happy with the design before he d
> > I didn't attempt to design, just to reorg the info. Sure, we've got +1 for
> > jim's design.
>
> ok, your 'reorg' looks good then :)
:)
> > The only concern is that we have move than the front page and it'd be nice
> > to have the other paged designed in the same fashion. Hmm, at least to
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
> I didn't attempt to design, just to reorg the info. Sure, we've got +1 for
> jim's design.
ok, your 'reorg' looks good then :)
> The only concern is that we have move than the front page and it'd be nice
> to have the other paged designed in the same
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sat, 6 May 2000, brian moseley wrote:
>
> > nah, it's still at
> > http://www.vagabondage.com/~jim/modperl. it was just a
> > preview, i was waiting for others to +1 it or whatever
> > before i told him to finish it up. then i forgot about it.
>
On Sat, 6 May 2000, brian moseley wrote:
> nah, it's still at
> http://www.vagabondage.com/~jim/modperl. it was just a
> preview, i was waiting for others to +1 it or whatever
> before i told him to finish it up. then i forgot about it.
+1 on using jim's design! besides the fact that it's real
On Sat, 6 May 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
[...]
> > nah, it's still at
> > http://www.vagabondage.com/~jim/modperl. it was just a
> > preview, i was waiting for others to +1 it or whatever
> > before i told him to finish it up. then i forgot about it.
>
> Ok, It's nicer of course.
Much. +909893849
At 08:34 07/05/2000 +0300, Stas Bekman wrote:
>Sure, Robin. That's fine. It was just a common understanding that you are
>going to release the new site very soon now, so all the attempts to make
>some improvement were halted, if you can say that there were any at all :)
Oh, sorry about that. It's
> At 19:12 06/05/2000 +0300, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >I don't know what happens with Robin and Matt work, but unless someone
> >starts to commit and finish things we will never get there. I guess
> >whoever makes the first move will have his design accepted.
>
> I don't know what happened to Matt, I
At 19:12 06/05/2000 +0300, Stas Bekman wrote:
>I don't know what happens with Robin and Matt work, but unless someone
>starts to commit and finish things we will never get there. I guess
>whoever makes the first move will have his design accepted.
I don't know what happened to Matt, I know he mov
On Sat, 6 May 2000, James Home wrote:
> Sometime on 5/6/00, brian moseley was saying:
> >what do you think?
> >
> >I don't like the main font
> >selection -- it looks ugly on netscape/linux. I guess it's because it
> >forces a point size which picks the wrong font.
>
> I think I should look at
On Sat, 6 May 2000, brian moseley wrote:
> On Sat, 6 May 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > Huh? Was I supposed to? I've heard about at least two
> > groups of people working on the site for the last year,
> > I've tired of waiting and remade the first page since I
> > use it all the time. I thought
On Sat, 6 May 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Huh? Was I supposed to? I've heard about at least two
> groups of people working on the site for the last year,
> I've tired of waiting and remade the first page since I
> use it all the time. I thought Jim's work was only a
> preview and someone is going
On Sat, 6 May 2000, brian moseley wrote:
> On 6 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > sbekman 00/05/06 08:31:53
> >
> > Modified:.index.html
> > Log:
> > index.html remake
>
> didn't use jim's work after all eh? too bad, it's much
> nicer, imo.
Huh? Was I supposed to?
On 6 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> sbekman 00/05/06 08:31:53
>
> Modified:.index.html
> Log:
> index.html remake
didn't use jim's work after all eh? too bad, it's much
nicer, imo.
16 matches
Mail list logo
