On Mon, Nov 02, 1998, George Adams wrote:
> I'm having difficulty getting mod_ssl working with Apache 1.3.3 on my
> machine (Digital Unix 4.0d)
>
> I've followed the instructions in mod_ssl's INSTALL file, using
> SSLeay-0.9.0b and rsaref-2.0 . Once everything was built, I tried doing a
> "make
I'm having difficulty getting mod_ssl working with Apache 1.3.3 on my machine (Digital
Unix 4.0d)
I've followed the instructions in mod_ssl's INSTALL file, using SSLeay-0.9.0b and
rsaref-2.0 . Once everything was built, I tried doing a "make certifcate TYPE=test",
which crashed with the messag
Just for your information: I've uploaded a few new files to the mod_ssl
Contrib area (http://www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/contrib/).
SSLeay-autoconf-1.0.tar.gz:
This is a GNU Autoconf frontend for the SSLeay source tree. The idea is
that the current SSLeay installation steps are, say a
Mark,
I understand you won't be distributing source. But my real question is, as
mod_ssl becomes a true module, will you be offerring a product with a
mod_ssl module (compiled) that can be plugged into a custom-compiled
version of Apache, and that will stay up with the current Apache releas
On Mon, Nov 02, 1998, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>[...]
> So, go for it. Now you _can_ register under:
> http://www0.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/example/refs.phtml
Ops, sorry. Cut & pasted to fast the URL of my development box.
The correct URL is the following (of course):
http://www.engelschal
> Please feel free to add your SSL-aware mod_ssl-based public-accessible
> websites ;-)
> > If you want, here are some public servers I've done w/ mod_ssl :
> > https://ucnet.missouri.edu/
> This one isn't accessible to the public, right?
Our servers say only: Only for internal use (in german!). T
On Sun, Nov 01, 1998, sTeFFeN wrote:
> > OTOH without any joke: Shouldn't we setup a mod_ssl reference list somewhere
> > on the website where users can register there website, so others see who is
> > already running Apache+mod_ssl? I mean a similar list as Apache has (although
> >
> > Opinions
Le sam, 31 oct 1998, vous avez écrit :
>On Thu, Oct 29, 1998, Ronan-Yann Lorin wrote:
>
>> did you mentionned (in the documentation) that SSL_BASE can be set to
>> SYSTEM: SSL_BASE=SYSTEM for a System installation of SSL as with Khimenko
>> Victor SSLeay package for Linux.
>
>Yeah, there are these
On Mon, 02 Nov 1998 03:30:06 GMT, you wrote:
>On Sun, 01 Nov 1998 01:39:13 +0100, you wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> > As a result I never succeeded in making an SSL connection using client
>>> > certificate with MSIE.
>>>
>>> Just to inform you that your request is not ig
On Sun, 01 Nov 1998 01:39:13 +0100, you wrote:
>
>
>Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
>>
>> > As a result I never succeeded in making an SSL connection using client
>> > certificate with MSIE.
>>
>> Just to inform you that your request is not ignored: I've no clue what's going
>> wrong with MSIE and I
> OTOH without any joke: Shouldn't we setup a mod_ssl reference list somewhere
> on the website where users can register there website, so others see who is
> already running Apache+mod_ssl? I mean a similar list as Apache has (although
>
> Opinions?
I would register...
Would be intressting...
S
Background:
Client: NT4+SP4_128+MSIE4.01(the one in Y2K bundle)
Server: Apache-1.3.3 + mod_ssl-2.0.13 on RedHat 5.1-i386
1- (server) self made(signed) CA certificate (appended
to the list of CA's extracted from Netscape, file
/etc/httpd/conf/ssl.crt/ca-bundle.crt)
2- (client) stage 1 se
12 matches
Mail list logo
