Re: certs and load balancing?

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
On Tue, Jun 22, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You may want to consider a solution from F5 Labs or HolonTech that will always "route" data to a particular server based upon SSL session id. Otherwise, you'll have a

Re: [BugDB] PRIVATE: Solaris 2.6 + mod_ssl + SIGHUP = SegFault for (PR#193)

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 23, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] well 2.3.5 came out and I tried compiling it and and also mm-1.0.7. mm came out with two awk errors , so I built mod_ssl without mm.. Err.. and which Awk errors, please? How do you

Re: [BugDB] PRIVATE: Solaris 2.6 + mod_ssl + SIGHUP = SegFault for (PR#193)

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999, Scott R. Every wrote: Here are the errors _I_ got: awk: cmd. line:1: BEGIN { printf("%c%c%c%c%c%c", 27, 91, 49, 109, 0, 0); } /dev/null awk: cmd. line:1: ^ parse error awk: cmd. line:1: BEGIN { printf("%c%c%c%c%c%c", 27, 91, 49, 109, 0, 0); } /dev/null awk: cmd.

Re: SSLProxy with Client Certificate

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999, Matthias Loepfe wrote: I'm testing some of your new features in mod_ssl. I'm currently testing the unreleased patch for the SSLProxy. Am I right that client certificate handling is not yet finished? Hmmm... there might be still a bug, yes. Client certificate handling

Re: certs and load balancing?

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
On 23-Jun-99 at 17:23, Ben Laurie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: There were good reasons why I kicked it out in the past. But the suggestion to reintegrate it is ok, of course. The hint of threading actually makes it interesting again. I'm currently finishing my new multithreading library

SSLCertificateChainFile directive...

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
where you want to explicitly construct the server certificate chain you should now evaluate this new facility. For this please grab ftp://ftp.modssl.org/snapshot/mod_ssl-SNAP-19990623.tar.gz or newer and try it out. Greetings, Ralf S. Engelschall

Unable to apply modssl to apache

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Hi, I was applying mod_ssl to Apache by running 'configure.bat' provided in mod_ssl-2.3.3-1.3.6 source. I am getting an error "Bad file descriptor at configure.bat line 202". At line 202 in configure.bat is -open(FP, "$patch --forward --directory=$apache pkg.eapi\\eapi.patch 21|") || die

Re: [BugDB] PRIVATE: Solaris 2.6 + mod_ssl + SIGHUP = SegFault for (PR#194)

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hiyas.. I would of posted the awk errors I got but I didn't have them handy, so just incase you haven't fixed these error already, here is what I am seeing: $ ./configure awk: syntax error near line 1 awk: illegal statement near line 1

Re: [BugDB] PRIVATE: Solaris 2.6 + mod_ssl + SIGHUP = SegFault for (PR#195)

1999-06-23 Thread modssl-bugdb
On Wed, 23 Jun 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 23, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] well 2.3.5 came out and I tried compiling it and and also mm-1.0.7. mm came out with two awk errors , so I built mod_ssl without mm.. Err.. and which Awk errors, please? How do you

[BugDB] Can't run httpd as non root user with EAPI (PR#196)

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Full_Name: Francis J. Lacoste Version: 2.3.5 OS: Linux 2.2.6ac1 (Custom RH6) Submission from: bourdieu.insu.com (206.167.33.254) When apache is compiled with EAPI support and use the MM library, it is now impossible to start httpd as a non root user because the path to the EAPI_MM_CORE_PATH is

Re: [BugDB] PRIVATE: Solaris 2.6 + mod_ssl + SIGHUP = SegFault for (PR#193)

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Here is some platform info: awk --version GNU Awk 3.0.3 Copyright (C) 1989, 1991-1997 Free Software Foundation. This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2