Re: Name-based Virtual-Hosts don't work with SSL

2001-03-28 Thread Owen Boyle
Deocs Postmaster wrote: > It appears two name based SSL sites can share the same IP address > provided they use the same certificate and key. The browser > complains about the name mismatch, but the user can browse the site. > It also appears that "DocumentRoot" and other commands work as > expec

Re: URL Rewriting in Java over mod_SSL

2001-03-28 Thread Wolle
Ok, i'll try. Thank you for your very fast answers ,-) Greetings, Michael David Rees wrote: > I'm sorry, so Tomcat 3.2.2b2 does fix it or it doesn't? > > If it doesn't, you may want to inquire with them > ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) with your > rewriting problem. They'll certainly

RE: URL Rewriting in Java over mod_SSL

2001-03-28 Thread David Rees
I'm sorry, so Tomcat 3.2.2b2 does fix it or it doesn't? If it doesn't, you may want to inquire with them ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) with your rewriting problem. They'll certainly want to try to fix this one before 3.2.2 is released. -Dave > -Original Message- > From: [EMA

Re: URL Rewriting in Java over mod_SSL

2001-03-28 Thread Wolle
no ,sorry I've installed the know the Tomcat 3.2.2b2 an the same procedure.. But all of that, the dispatcher is much faster when you run the servlet first ;-) David Rees wrote: > This is a bug in in jakarta-tomcat, not mod_ssl. > > It is fixed in the latest beta release, you might want to try th

RE: URL Rewriting in Java over mod_SSL

2001-03-28 Thread David Rees
This is a bug in in jakarta-tomcat, not mod_ssl. It is fixed in the latest beta release, you might want to try that if you can't wait for jakarta-tomcat 3.2.2. -Dave > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wolle > > Hello , > I have wrote

URL Rewriting in Java over mod_SSL

2001-03-28 Thread Wolle
Hello , I have wrote some Java Servlets, that works with Session Tracking. I use the response.encodeURL Methode for it. when the client has disabled cookies, the jsessionID is suffixed. Thats fine ;-) this will work with Tomcat , and Tomcat over Apache. Now, when I User mod_ssl for the connectio

RE: virtual hosts and mod_ssl

2001-03-28 Thread David Rees
You are correct! You can virtual host SSL sites with separate IP addresses just fine. -Dave > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of George Walsh > > In my case, I have the option of IP aliasing, so it would seem I > simply have to establ

Re: virtual hosts and mod_ssl

2001-03-28 Thread George Walsh
In my case, I have the option of IP aliasing, so it would seem I simply have to establish a separate IP on the LAN for each virtual host I require and then specifically set up the virtual host directive for each one in turn with both ports. That looks deliciously simple. Is that all I need do t

Re: Name-based Virtual-Hosts don't work with SSL

2001-03-28 Thread Deocs Postmaster
At 02:51 AM 03/26/2001 , you wrote: >David Rees wrote: > > > > Please read the FAQ. > > > > http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html#ToC47 > > > > This question comes up so often it should be in the .sig of the list! > > >Either nobody ever reads the FAQ (quite probable) or the FAQ entry is >ra

Re: virtual hosts and mod_ssl

2001-03-28 Thread Owen Boyle
Gian Maria Gamboni wrote: > > Hi All! > I'm new to mod_ssl, so the things which I'm going to say may be sounds > ridicolous but I'm not able to solve this: > I have just three virtualhosts which should listen on 80 and 443 at the same > time, how can I do this ? > > I've just built the new relea