Re: ??? 1.3.23

2002-01-27 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Tom Oehser wrote: > I found the documentation on how to upgrade *modssl* later, using apxs. > But that method doesn't seem to apply to upgrading *apache*... The short answer is that while it *can* be done, it's a very manual process and it's highly prone to mistakes. If you

Re: ??? 1.3.23

2002-01-27 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002, Tom Oehser wrote: > [...] > And, the mod_ssl I get from CVS is for 1.3.20, which is *less* than the > one that is downloadable already built for 1.3.22, shooting holes in my > initial theory that going to the CVS was even getting me closer to now... Ops, my fault. The rsyn

Re: ??? 1.3.23

2002-01-27 Thread Tom Oehser
P.S. I found the documentation on how to upgrade *modssl* later, using apxs. But that method doesn't seem to apply to upgrading *apache*... -Tom __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User S

unable to configure the client authentication,why?

2002-01-27 Thread zhongduhang
Dear all: I have installed apache+mod_ssl+openssl on the windows 2000,and I also create the server cert and key,and the apache with openssl can works well. but when I want to configure the client authentication,it can not start. my configure looks like: SSLMutex sem SSLRandomSeed sta

unable to configure the client authentication,why?

2002-01-27 Thread zhongduhang
Dear all: I have installed apache+mod_ssl+openssl on the windows 2000,and I also create the server cert and key,and the apache with openssl can works well. but when I want to configure the client authentication,it can not start. my configure looks like: SSLMutex sem SSLRandomSeed sta

??? 1.3.23

2002-01-27 Thread Tom Oehser
Is there a procedure that is known to be worth attempting to put a modssl-X onto an apache-X+1? Is there any intention or plan of releasing it within X days of the apache release? Is there any documentation of what is involved in doing it myself? I saw mention of people having done it successf

Re: MOD SSL over NAT

2002-01-27 Thread Glen Mehn
you will need separate VirtualHost sections for both port 80 and port 443: example (not real): NameVirtualHost 10.10.10.10 Servername my.server.com DocumentRoot /path/to/docs ServerName my.server.com DocumentRoot /path/to/htdocs ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (etc...) On Sun, Jan 27

Re: MOD SSL over NAT

2002-01-27 Thread Eli Marmor
Jim Lee wrote: > Response to Response: > Yes, the Firewall is configured to allow port 443. > > In fact we are able to reach our web server from outside(internet) by typing > in the following url. > > http://www.website.com:443 > > But the moment we try the following url, it fails > > https:/

Re: MOD SSL over NAT

2002-01-27 Thread Jim Lee
Response to Response: Yes, the Firewall is configured to allow port 443. In fact we are able to reach our web server from outside(internet) by typing in the following url. http://www.website.com:443 But the moment we try the following url, it fails https://www.website.com The same above step