Re: mod_sll virtual hosts

2002-08-17 Thread Ron Ridley
Try something like this using IP based virtual hosts: Each one of your virtual hosts can have different SSL key material it points to. # This section only goes in the conf file once - Port 80 ServerName domain.com NameVirtualHost x.x.x.x #- Dom

Is OpenSSL + ModSSL 128 bit encryption capable?

2002-08-17 Thread Jindo
Good Day, My web server softwares are: - OpenSSL 0.96g - mod_ssl 2.8.10 - Apache 1.26 My ISP told me this combination could only support 40-bit cipher strength. However, on mod_ssl official page, I did see: 128-bit strong cryptography world-wide In order to clarify this, would experienced

Re: mod_sll virtual hosts

2002-08-17 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Ron Ridley wrote: > Try something like this using IP based virtual hosts: Each one of your > virtual hosts can have different SSL key material it points to. > # This section only goes in the conf file once - > Port 80 > ServerName domain.com >

Re: mod_sll virtual hosts

2002-08-17 Thread Iuri Fiedoruk
Em Sab 17 Ago 2002 11:21, Cliff Woolley escreveu: > On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Ron Ridley wrote: > > Try something like this using IP based virtual hosts: Each one of your > > virtual hosts can have different SSL key material it points to. > > # This section only goes in the conf file once >

Re: mod_sll virtual hosts

2002-08-17 Thread Ron Ridley
My mistake. I have an entry NameVirtualHost but it is in the form of NameVirtualHost ip.address.of.host probably left over from some testing. It works for me (as is) which is why I left it in the example. My apologies. -Ron On 17 Aug 2002 14:31 CDT you wrote: > Em Sab 17 Ago 2002 11:21, Cl

Re: Is OpenSSL + ModSSL 128 bit encryption capable?

2002-08-17 Thread Randy Katz
Yes, it works. On Saturday 17 August 2002 06:07, Jindo wrote: > Good Day, > > My web server softwares are: > > - OpenSSL 0.96g > - mod_ssl 2.8.10 > - Apache 1.26 > > My ISP told me this combination could only support 40-bit cipher > strength. However, on mod_ssl official page, I did see: > >