RE: Apache 2.0.44 with Openssl -0.9.7

2003-03-07 Thread Ted Rolle
Yes, this is true. But DSO should work too. On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, apachep2 wrote: > Of course. When you build mod_ssl into apache (that is STATIC), you > won't encounter X509_free issue. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yu, Ming > Sen

RE: Apache 2.0.44 with Openssl -0.9.7

2003-03-07 Thread Ted Rolle
Good. Now what is the configuration file for OpenSSL? On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Yu, Ming wrote: > I use the following switches to compile APACHE 2.0.44 with OpenSSL 0.9.7 > ../configure --enable-layout=TEST \ > --enable-ssl \ > --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl \ > --

Re: private key not found

2003-03-07 Thread Justin Williams
oh goody... LOL The CA tells me it was on an Apache server, and the owner tells me it was on a *nix system, but, with them downloading the file and tinkering, maybe something got tinkered the wrong way... - Original Message - From: "Carlos Villegas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: private key not found

2003-03-07 Thread Carlos Villegas
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Justin Williams wrote: > don't think you can make a key from a crt... only works the other way > around... Tempted to do that, though... You're right, it doesn't work the other way around. otherwise SSL would be worthless... It seems to me that your keys might be corrupted

Re: private key not found

2003-03-07 Thread Justin Williams
don't think you can make a key from a crt... only works the other way around... Tempted to do that, though... - Original Message - From: "A. Putnam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 6:01 PM Subject: Re: private key not found Oh, I see now. Well

Re: private key not found

2003-03-07 Thread A. Putnam
Oh, I see now. Well, it's nothing like that. Pelathe has had its domain since '98. We've had a sever that died and had to transfer everything to a new Linux box, but this is the first time we've ever tried to make a ssl server, so I don't think that would make a difference. It's really strange

Re: private key not found

2003-03-07 Thread Justin Williams
I had a domain that was transferred to my server, and with it came the key and crt files from the old server. That particular domain the SSL is blowing up... More accurately, Apache refuses to start, with the same error you get, when I try to enable the SSL for that domain... - Original Mess

Re: private key not found

2003-03-07 Thread A. Putnam
I'm not too sure what you mean when you ask if the domain was transferred. What domain? All I know I did was that I generated the key/csr/crts and self-signed the CA. On Thursday 06 March 2003 14:03, Justin Williams wrote: > was the domain moved over to your server, or did you generate key/csr/c

Re: private key not found

2003-03-07 Thread A. Putnam
I'm not sure what you mean. I followed the mod_ssl faq to generate all the key/csr/crt files, then $./sign.sh the server.csr to make the server.crt. /etc/httpd/ssl.key/server.key is the correct path and the file is there. I finally managed to chmod it to 0400. (I got confused to what rw-r--r--

RE: Apache 2.0.44 with Openssl -0.9.7

2003-03-07 Thread Ian Miller
I just run config with ./configure --enable-ssl --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl --enable-so --enable-rewrite --enable-speling solairs 9 & 8 systems gcc 3.2.2 gnu binutils 2.13.2.1 I th

RE: Apache 2.0.44 with Openssl -0.9.7

2003-03-07 Thread apachep2
Of course. When you build mod_ssl into apache (that is STATIC), you won't encounter X509_free issue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yu, Ming Sent: March 7, 2003 10:57 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Apache 2.0.44 with Openssl -0.9.

RE: Apache 2.0.44 with Openssl -0.9.7

2003-03-07 Thread Yu, Ming
I use the following switches to compile APACHE 2.0.44 with OpenSSL 0.9.7 ./configure --enable-layout=TEST \ --enable-ssl \ --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl \ --enable-mods-shared=max \ --enable-modules=most \ --with-mpm=worker

RE: Apache 2.0.44 with Openssl -0.9.7

2003-03-07 Thread apachep2
It looks like many people getting this "undefined symbol X509_free" when we try to build mod_ssl as a shared module. I am still waiting for the solution. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Rolle Sent: March 7, 2003 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROT

Re: Apache 2.0.44 with Openssl -0.9.7

2003-03-07 Thread Ted Rolle
YOU GOT Apache-2.0.44 and OpenSSL-0.9.7 WORKING??? What are your ./configure files like? I keep getting the dreaded "can't find X509_free" message. On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Ian Miller wrote: > > Did you uncomment out the entropy lines in the ssl.conf file? > I am running it with 0.9.7a and it works f

Re: Apache 2.0.44 with Openssl -0.9.7

2003-03-07 Thread Ian Miller
Did you uncomment out the entropy lines in the ssl.conf file? I am running it with 0.9.7a and it works fine -Ian Quoting "Yu, Ming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Does anyone have problem with apache 2.0.44 and Openssl 0.9.7. > I installed the server, no problem. Then I wanted to start the httpd > ser

Re: mod_ssl/mod_jk failure with client authentication on

2003-03-07 Thread Aaron Stromas
I realised that I included irrelevant log snipet from the SSL log. Please see the correction below. Aaron Stromas said: > Hi, > > I apologise for cross-posting - I'm really not sure which component is > at fault, looks like mod_ssl but possibly mod_jk. BTW, is there a list > (or some other venue)

mod_ssl/mod_jk failure with client authentication on

2003-03-07 Thread Aaron Stromas
Hi, I apologise for cross-posting - I'm really not sure which component is at fault, looks like mod_ssl but possibly mod_jk. BTW, is there a list (or some other venue) dedicated to mod_jk? My environment is Apache 1.3.22, mod_ssl 2.8.5, OpenSSL 0.9.6b, tomcat 4.0.3. I have a servlet mounted like