mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-16 Thread Jan Vejvalka
host configuration is the same (yes, using the same certificate for both hosts - I didn't try to change it, and I don't mind it in this application). I'm -sort-of- puzzled. Please help. Thanks, Jan +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Dr. Jan

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-17 Thread Jan Vejvalka
Thanks for the reply. > If you're using the same SSL configuration and the same certificate for > both hosts (generally not an option in the real world because of the > security alert boxes it brings up in the browser), then you won't _notice_ > a problem with namevirtualhost. That's because you

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts (oops)

2001-07-17 Thread Jan Vejvalka
> This, however, does not work if I use > (the same IP address for all hosts) instead of . > > Still a bit confused. Definitely confused: I turned that just the other way. Now correctly: when I specify the IP address (the same IP for all the SSL v-hosts), it works. When I use the asterisk,

Re: mod_ssl and name-based virtual hosts

2001-07-17 Thread Jan Vejvalka
Jeff, Thanks for the sequence, it's clear now. Just why doesn't it work with the wildcarded VirtualHost ? I didn't come to the idea of the wildcard certificate, and I didn't mind the popup messages. It's better without them, thanks ! Jan > If so, then it is quite simple > 1/. browser looks