The only problem I have ever had with a certificate under either Unix
(Solaris and Linux) or NT was forgetting to renew one once. Sounds like
your University IS Dept is staffed by incompetents.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Robert Richart wrote:
> I'm a librarian in charge of a Solaris server. The library wants to
> offer some services requiring ssl (e.g. forms requiring social security
> numbers). I have installed an Apache web server with mod-ssl and created
> my own certificate, but we will need an official certificate to make
> this work properly. The University IS Dept. tells me that SSL
> Certificates are a big hassle and it would be a mistake for the library
> to try to maintain one. They have had major problems with certificates.
> They are a totally NT shop. The library has the only UNIX server on
> campus. So my question is, are there problems with maintaining an SSL
> Certificate on a Solaris box? Or are these problems only related to
> Microsoft incompatibilities? Does anyone have recommendation about
> signing authorities? Verisign or Thawte? Thanks.
>
> Bob Richart, Systems Librarian
> City University
> 919 SW Grady Way
> Renton, WA 98055
> (425) 204-3756
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
> User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
