Apache 1.3.12 is already around the corner and should be released
these days (be patient, please!), so I'll release mod_ssl 2.6.0 for
it. Because I'm not available the coming days (we have our church
marriage-ceremony on this weekend ;) and I don't wanted to let you wait
to use SSL with this Apac
I made RPMs for both 2.5.1 and 2.6.0, but someone uploaded before I had
a chance to.
Problem is, those RPMs contain some errors, an invalid serial number,
no changelog, etc
(and as far as I've seen aren't ANNOUNCed yet.)
Could you please replace them with the ones I built?
They are on: ftp://ww
Sorry, list users
That was not intended for the list, please ignore.
/magnus
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 07:49:06AM +0100, Magnus Stenman wrote:
> I made RPMs for both 2.5.1 and 2.6.0, but someone uploaded before I had
> a chance to.
>
> Problem is, those RPMs contain some errors, an invalid serial
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000, Magnus Stenman wrote:
> Sorry, list users
> That was not intended for the list, please ignore.
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 07:49:06AM +0100, Magnus Stenman wrote:
> > I made RPMs for both 2.5.1 and 2.6.0, but someone uploaded before I had
> > a chance to.
> >
> > Problem i
Hy,
i did a quick test with Apache 1.3.12, mod_ssl 2.6.0 and both OpenSSL
0.9.4 and 0.9.5beta1 under Win98 and WinNT/SP5.
Got the following error message using NMAKE Version 6.00.8168.0:
cl.exe /nologo /c /O2 /MD /W3 /GX /DNDEBUG /DWIN32 /D_WINDOWS
/DSHARED_MODULE /DEAPI /DMOD_SSL=206100 /DMOD_
> i did a quick test with Apache 1.3.12, mod_ssl 2.6.0 and both OpenSSL
> 0.9.4 and 0.9.5beta1 under Win98 and WinNT/SP5.
And the story continues...
> Did anyone else take a look? I couldn´t find any errors with mod_ssl.
> Last version running was mod_ssl 2.4.10. Is there any cvs log or so,
> whe
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000, Daniel S. Reichenbach wrote:
> > i did a quick test with Apache 1.3.12, mod_ssl 2.6.0 and both OpenSSL
> > 0.9.4 and 0.9.5beta1 under Win98 and WinNT/SP5.
> And the story continues...
>
> > Did anyone else take a look? I couldn´t find any errors with mod_ssl.
> > Last versi
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000, Daniel S. Reichenbach wrote:
> [...]
> Did anyone else take a look? I couldn´t find any errors with mod_ssl.
> Last version running was mod_ssl 2.4.10. Is there any cvs log or so,
> where i can take a look at things changed since 2.4.10 ?
You can retrieve a copy of the CVS
> > Last version running was mod_ssl 2.4.10. Is there any cvs log or so,
> > where i can take a look at things changed since 2.4.10 ?
>
> You can retrieve a copy of the CVS source repository via rsync as
> explain on http://www.modssl.org/source/repos.html and then checkout
> particular mod_ssl ve
Daniel S. Reichenbach (27.2.2000 15:43):
>> i did a quick test with Apache 1.3.12, mod_ssl 2.6.0 and both OpenSSL
>> 0.9.4 and 0.9.5beta1 under Win98 and WinNT/SP5.
>And the story continues...
>
>Anyone else out there, who has Apache with mod_ssl higher than 2.4.10
>up and running ???
Both 2.5.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000, Mäkinen Tero FCOM wrote:
> Daniel S. Reichenbach (27.2.2000 15:43):
> >> i did a quick test with Apache 1.3.12, mod_ssl 2.6.0 and both OpenSSL
> >> 0.9.4 and 0.9.5beta1 under Win98 and WinNT/SP5.
> >And the story continues...
> >
> >Anyone else out there, who has Apache wi
> > #ifdef WIN32
> > #include
> > #endif
> >
> > These additions work also with vc++ 5.0
>
> Ok, I've added these lines to mod_ssl.h for 2.6.1.
Just checked it with NT5 and Win98. Works fine for both.
Daniel
__
The OpenSA Proj
12 matches
Mail list logo
