Re: Mod-ssl and Apache

2007-09-12 Thread Mads Toftum
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 09:55:52AM +0100, Glyn Astill wrote: > "Considering this a mailing list for modssl 1.x not 2.x" > mod_ssl _for httpd 1.3_ not _modssl for httpd 2.x_. With httpd 2.x, modssl is integrated and doesn't need an external patch. That being said, I've seen quite a bit of httpd 2.x

RE: Mod-ssl and Apache

2007-09-12 Thread Glyn Astill
ember 11, 2007 12:19 PM > To: modssl-users@modssl.org > Subject: Re: Mod-ssl and Apache > > Considering this a mailing list for modssl 1.x not 2.x, which is > part > of the apache distribution... you may need to seek help on the > apache > mailing lists. > &

Re: Mod-ssl and Apache

2007-09-11 Thread Mads Toftum
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:50:10PM -0700, Yvo van Doorn wrote: > Its not really complaining, more in that modssl.org and its downloads > are geared for apache 1.3.x not apache 2.x as they took incorporated > modssl into the source thus you can pretty much expect better support > for apache 2.x rela

Re: Mod-ssl and Apache

2007-09-11 Thread Yvo van Doorn
On 9/11/07, Mads Toftum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:10:20PM -0400, Aaron Smith wrote: > > Oh! My apologies. I thought this was a mailing list for mod_ssl > > independent of version. > > > It has been used for both versions over time - this is pretty much the > first tim

Re: Mod-ssl and Apache

2007-09-11 Thread Mads Toftum
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:10:20PM -0400, Aaron Smith wrote: > Oh! My apologies. I thought this was a mailing list for mod_ssl > independent of version. > It has been used for both versions over time - this is pretty much the first time anyone complained. vh Mads Toftum -- http://soulfood.dk _

RE: Mod-ssl and Apache

2007-09-11 Thread Aaron Smith
Oh! My apologies. I thought this was a mailing list for mod_ssl independent of version. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yvo van Doorn Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:19 PM To: modssl-users@modssl.org Subject: Re: Mod-ssl and Apache

Re: Mod-ssl and Apache

2007-09-11 Thread Yvo van Doorn
Considering this a mailing list for modssl 1.x not 2.x, which is part of the apache distribution... you may need to seek help on the apache mailing lists. modssl 1.x =! modssl 2.x On 9/11/07, Aaron Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Not sure if these messages are getting throu

Mod-ssl and Apache

2007-09-11 Thread Aaron Smith
Not sure if these messages are getting through or not. I'm having trouble with mod_ssl 2.0.55 and apache 2.0.55. The compile and make goes fine, but when the server is running, and connections are made via SSL, the child processes segfault. If mod_ssl is compiled into the apache bina

Re: Mod-ssl and apache configuration question

2004-11-08 Thread Mads Toftum
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 05:07:06PM -0700, Kory Wheatley wrote: > I have a project where I need to setup an Apache secure server. I have > an Apache non secure server already on my workstation. I don't want the > Apache secure server to run under the same daemon service, so I've > downloaded a

Mod-ssl and apache configuration question

2004-11-05 Thread Kory Wheatley
I have a project where I need to setup an Apache secure server. I have an Apache non secure server already on my workstation. I don't want the Apache secure server to run under the same daemon service, so I've downloaded a separate Apache tar file. This server also needs to run under a differ

Re: mod ssl and Apache

1999-05-11 Thread Dennis Ball
I have Apache 1.3.6 and mod_ssl - 2.2.8 and OpenSSL-0.9.2b and I am having some weird Web server startup problems.  I am currently only testing so it is not critical.  The install went exactly as noted  - THANK YOU FOR EXCELLENT INSTALL NOTES.   However, when I started the httpd using "/usr/