RE: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.6.0-1.3.12, Win32 broken

2000-02-27 Thread Daniel S. Reichenbach
> > Last version running was mod_ssl 2.4.10. Is there any cvs log or so, > > where i can take a look at things changed since 2.4.10 ? > > You can retrieve a copy of the CVS source repository via rsync as > explain on http://www.modssl.org/source/repos.html and then checkout > particular mod_ssl ve

Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.6.0-1.3.12, Win32 broken

2000-02-27 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000, Daniel S. Reichenbach wrote: > [...] > Did anyone else take a look? I couldn´t find any errors with mod_ssl. > Last version running was mod_ssl 2.4.10. Is there any cvs log or so, > where i can take a look at things changed since 2.4.10 ? You can retrieve a copy of the CVS

Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.6.0-1.3.12, Win32 broken

2000-02-27 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000, Daniel S. Reichenbach wrote: > > i did a quick test with Apache 1.3.12, mod_ssl 2.6.0 and both OpenSSL > > 0.9.4 and 0.9.5beta1 under Win98 and WinNT/SP5. > And the story continues... > > > Did anyone else take a look? I couldn´t find any errors with mod_ssl. > > Last versi

RE: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.6.0-1.3.12, Win32 broken

2000-02-27 Thread Daniel S. Reichenbach
> i did a quick test with Apache 1.3.12, mod_ssl 2.6.0 and both OpenSSL > 0.9.4 and 0.9.5beta1 under Win98 and WinNT/SP5. And the story continues... > Did anyone else take a look? I couldn´t find any errors with mod_ssl. > Last version running was mod_ssl 2.4.10. Is there any cvs log or so, > whe

RE: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.6.0-1.3.12, Win32 broken

2000-02-26 Thread Daniel S. Reichenbach
Hy, i did a quick test with Apache 1.3.12, mod_ssl 2.6.0 and both OpenSSL 0.9.4 and 0.9.5beta1 under Win98 and WinNT/SP5. Got the following error message using NMAKE Version 6.00.8168.0: cl.exe /nologo /c /O2 /MD /W3 /GX /DNDEBUG /DWIN32 /D_WINDOWS /DSHARED_MODULE /DEAPI /DMOD_SSL=206100 /DMOD_