RE: Keepalives

2001-10-12 Thread Nick Temple
iday, October 12, 2001 10:24 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Keepalives > > >"Tim Pushor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What would the ramifications be of disabling keep alives altogether? >That's essentially what the config file below does.

RE: Keepalives

2001-10-12 Thread Tim Pushor
. Any ideas? Thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Rescorla Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 10:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Keepalives "Tim Pushor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What would the ramificati

Re: Keepalives

2001-10-12 Thread Mads Toftum
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 09:23:49AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > "Tim Pushor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What would the ramifications be of disabling keep alives altogether? > That's essentially what the config file below does. > > In general, it leads to lousy performance. Keepalives were >

Re: Keepalives

2001-10-12 Thread Eric Rescorla
"Tim Pushor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What would the ramifications be of disabling keep alives altogether? That's essentially what the config file below does. In general, it leads to lousy performance. Keepalives were a very important HTTP performance improvement. -Ekr ___

RE: Keepalives

2001-10-12 Thread Tim Pushor
(failure rate went from 100% to 5-10%) but am still seeing problems. Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 9:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Keepalives >-Original Message- &g

RE: Keepalives

2001-10-12 Thread John . Airey
>-Original Message- >From: Eric Rescorla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 12 October 2001 16:06 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Keepalives > > >The mod_ssl conf file says: > ># Notice: Most problems of broken clients are also related >to the HTTP ># keep-alive facility, so you usual