iday, October 12, 2001 10:24 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Keepalives
>
>
>"Tim Pushor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What would the ramifications be of disabling keep alives altogether?
>That's essentially what the config file below does.
. Any
ideas?
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Rescorla
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Keepalives
"Tim Pushor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What would the ramificati
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 09:23:49AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> "Tim Pushor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What would the ramifications be of disabling keep alives altogether?
> That's essentially what the config file below does.
>
> In general, it leads to lousy performance. Keepalives were
>
"Tim Pushor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What would the ramifications be of disabling keep alives altogether?
That's essentially what the config file below does.
In general, it leads to lousy performance. Keepalives were
a very important HTTP performance improvement.
-Ekr
___
(failure rate went from 100% to 5-10%) but am still seeing problems.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 9:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Keepalives
>-Original Message-
&g
>-Original Message-
>From: Eric Rescorla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 12 October 2001 16:06
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Keepalives
>
>
>The mod_ssl conf file says:
>
># Notice: Most problems of broken clients are also related
>to the HTTP
># keep-alive facility, so you usual