ser.
If you do need SSL2 you could try using client IP based sticky sessions.
This may cause load imbalances though.
-Original Message-
From: Balázs Nagy
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11/5/00 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: Sharing SSLSessionCache in load balanced environment
Wohlgemuth, Michael J.
Wohlgemuth, Michael J. wrote:
> So it looks like the only option for us is to route each given client to the
> same webserver for all the requests. We have some Cisco LocalDirectors in
> house for this purpose. Does anyone have any experience in the real world
> on doing this? I'm a bit concer
Simon Haddon
x3174
Balázs Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/11/2000 04:03 PM
Please respond to modssl-users
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Sharing SSLSessionCache in load balanced environment
Jeffr
> -Original Message-
> From: Balázs Nagy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> the current proven approach is not to share the session cache, but
> to inspect the packets, and route them to the same server for a
> given session.
I've done a bit more research, and here is what I've found:
If it
Well some form of Level 3 balancing would meet this requirement...
Of course, it's not going to be very smart...
>-Original Message-
>From: Owen Boyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 9:42 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Sharin
Jeffrey Burgoyne wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Owen Boyle wrote:
>> "Wohlgemuth, Michael J." wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to implement some sort of load balancing for this site.
>>> ...the SSLSessionCache will need to be shared
>>> somehow across separate physical hosts.
the current proven app
I have not played around with the session cache stuff, but a quick look on
my system seems to indicate it is a file. Would it be possible to NSF
mount this file among multiple machine making it shared? It would be
useful for myself as we are adding a second server to our installation and
all our
"Wohlgemuth, Michael J." wrote:
> I would like to implement some sort of load balancing for this site.
> ...the SSLSessionCache will need to be shared
> somehow across separate physical hosts.
This is an interesting question which we have been considering since we
are planning to use load-bal
