Re: win32: which ms-compiler?

1999-10-24 Thread Tran Duc Trung
Kirk Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Any will work, as previously stated. The main difference affecting Apache > is that the standard edition compiler does not optimize code. Thus, if you > need the "utmost" performance, you might want to use the professional > edition and turn on the opti

RE: win32: which ms-compiler?

1999-10-22 Thread Kirk Benson
Any will work, as previously stated. The main difference affecting Apache is that the standard edition compiler does not optimize code. Thus, if you need the "utmost" performance, you might want to use the professional edition and turn on the optimization settings. -Original Message- Fr

Re: win32: which ms-compiler?

1999-10-22 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999, Frankewitsch wrote: > it's really a simple question: > mod_ssl has to be compiled with a ms-compiler. > > But ms offers 3 different versions > > which one is enough - > visual c++ standard > or visual c++ professionell > or visual c++ enterprise? Anyone shou

Re: win32: which ms-compiler?

1999-10-22 Thread Tran Duc Trung
Frankewitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > it's really a simple question: > mod_ssl has to be compiled with a ms-compiler. > > But ms offers 3 different versions > > which one is enough - > visual c++ standard > or visual c++ professionell > or visual c++ enterprise? It doesn't