On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Upgrade to 0.9.6e.
Make that 0.9.6f, released today. :)
--Cliff
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Make that 0.9.6f, released today. :)
That's what I get for not reading all of my email before responding to
any of it. 0.9.6g was also released today. Sigh. :)
__
Apache Interface
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 09 August 2002 04:27 pm, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Upgrade to 0.9.6e.
Make that 0.9.6f, released today. :)
g, just a few minutes ago..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6
Title: RE: Apache 2.039
Followed your instruction, finally got every configuration done. But server won't start with following message in error_log,
[Fri Aug 09 11:49:29 2002] [warn] Init: PRNG still contains not sufficient entropy!
[Fri Aug 09 11:49:32 2002] [error] Init: Failed to generate
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
That's what I get for not reading all of my email before responding to
any of it. 0.9.6g was also released today. Sigh. :)
I guess today was the day for releases. Apache 2.0.40 is now out as well.
--Cliff
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
That's what I get for not reading all of my email before responding to
any of it. 0.9.6g was also released today. Sigh. :)
I guess today was the day for releases. Apache 2.0.40 is now out as well.
This is a security fix release for those using apache in Cygwin
environments!
quote
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 22:07:52 +0100 (BST)
From: Mark J Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Full Disclosure [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Vuln-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Apache 2.0
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, R. DuFresne wrote:
Any word on if this compiles on those older linux kernels as the previous
release was a total dud in that realm?
Probably no change. But FWIW, I believe one of our developers tried it on
an older kernel and it worked fine for him... if you could
Gregg Andrew wrote:
Openssl.org
version 0.9.6e
Do you know what different between 0.9.6b and 0.9.6e, Because I
knew there are some of users they are using 0.9.6b, I think 0.9.6b is an
older version... But if I use the new version of Apache ( eg : 1.3.26 ),
so... use 0.9.6e is good ? I was
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know what different between 0.9.6b and 0.9.6e
Among other things, there are important security fixes in 0.9.6e (for
remotely exploitable bugs in 0.9.6d and earlier versions).
Upgrade to 0.9.6e.
--Cliff
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know what different between 0.9.6b and 0.9.6e
Among other things, there are important security fixes in 0.9.6e (for
remotely exploitable bugs in 0.9.6d and earlier versions).
Upgrade to 0.9.6e.
So, do you agree
11 matches
Mail list logo