Re: Apache 1.3.29 and 2.0.48 with SSL binaries for Windows

2003-11-04 Thread Don Woodward
I found a copy and got it working. Don Woodward - Original Message - From: "Don Woodward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 19:24 Subject: Re: Apache 1.3.29 and 2.0.48 with SSL binaries for Windows Attempting to make m

Re: Apache 1.3.29 and 2.0.48 with SSL binaries for Windows

2003-11-03 Thread Don Woodward
Attempting to make my own cert on my Win32 system at work it appears I'm missing the OpenSSL configuration file - see error below. I've built OpenSSL under Solaris before but my Sun is not up at the moment to get the file from - anyone have a configuration file example? C:\Apache\bin>openssl req

RE: apache 1.3.29?

2003-10-31 Thread Boyle Owen
isclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. >> >> >-Original Message- >> >> From: Zvi Har'El [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2003 09:54 >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Cc:

Re: apache 1.3.29?

2003-10-31 Thread Andreas Gietl
Rgds, > Owen Boyle > Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. > > >-Original Message- > > From: Zvi Har'El [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2003 09:54 > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: apache 1.3.29?

2003-10-31 Thread Boyle Owen
IL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: apache 1.3.29? > > >Hi Ralf, > >If you don't mind, please include a fix which allows the HTTPS >env variable >to be passed by suexec > >--- apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c.~20030719062731~ Sat >Jul 19 09:27:31

Re: apache 1.3.29?

2003-10-30 Thread Zvi Har'El
name starts with */ "HTTP_", #ifdef MOD_SSL -"HTTPS_", +"HTTPS=", "SSL_", #endif This is already included in apache 2 Thanks, Zvi. On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:06:52 +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote about "Re: apache 1.3.29?": >

Re: apache 1.3.29?

2003-10-30 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Andreas Gietl wrote: >> >> On Wednesday 29 October 2003 15:39, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> i guess there will be a new patch within the next days/hours? > > I would guess, but that's not my area :) Yes, there will be a mod_ssl 2.8.16 released today or

Re: apache 1.3.29?

2003-10-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
Andreas Gietl wrote: > > On Wednesday 29 October 2003 15:39, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > i guess there will be a new patch within the next days/hours? > I would guess, but that's not my area :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|]

Re: apache 1.3.29?

2003-10-29 Thread Andreas Gietl
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 15:39, Jim Jagielski wrote: i guess there will be a new patch within the next days/hours? > Yes it will, but the patch will not apply "cleanly". Using --force > is recommended. > > Peter Horst wrote: > > Just noticed that apache 1.3.29 was released. Will mod_ssl-2.8.1

Re: apache 1.3.29?

2003-10-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
Yes it will, but the patch will not apply "cleanly". Using --force is recommended. Peter Horst wrote: > > Just noticed that apache 1.3.29 was released. Will mod_ssl-2.8.15 work > with this? I'm using openssl-0.9.7c. > > Thanks much. > > Peter > > -- > What do you use on Linux to do your word