RE: Repudiability

2002-05-07 Thread John . Airey
> -Original Message- > From: Balázs Nagy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 07 May 2002 14:58 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Repudiability > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>Suppose someone refutes that they have sent information to &g

Re: Repudiability

2002-05-07 Thread Balázs Nagy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>Suppose someone refutes that they have sent information to a Web site >>owner, how is the Web site owner to prove that the information was in >>fact received and that it was signed with a given key? >> >>To do this, the Web site owner would presumably need to be >>able

RE: Repudiability

2002-05-07 Thread John . Airey
> -Original Message- > From: Andrew McNaughton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 06 May 2002 16:55 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Repudiability > > > > Suppose someone refutes that they have sent information to a Web site > owner, how is the We

Re: Repudiability

2002-05-06 Thread Mads Toftum
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 03:55:08AM +1200, Andrew McNaughton wrote: > > Suppose someone refutes that they have sent information to a Web site > owner, how is the Web site owner to prove that the information was in > fact received and that it was signed with a given key? > > To do this, the Web si

Repudiability

2002-05-06 Thread Andrew McNaughton
Suppose someone refutes that they have sent information to a Web site owner, how is the Web site owner to prove that the information was in fact received and that it was signed with a given key? To do this, the Web site owner would presumably need to be able to produce the still-encrypted post a