Re: FIXED: mod_ssl 2.1.x with DSO fails (@ Solaris)

1998-12-31 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Dec 30, 1998, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fixed: recompiled SSLeay with gcc-2.7.2, -O2 -g (previously: without -O2 -g) will check out other combinations tomorrow ... That's interesting. Then either the compiler was broken or at least SSLeay used some stuff which is slightly broken on

Re: mod_ssl 2.1.x with DSO fails (@ Solaris)

1998-12-30 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Tue, Dec 29, 1998, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sorry for mostly sleeping concerning mod_ssl over the last few weeks (I followed up to 2.1.0 but not afterwards). I just tested mod_ssl DSO support with Solaris 2.5.1, gcc-2.7.2: (tested with 2.1.0, 2.1.1 and 2.1.4) Everything works fine

Re: mod_ssl 2.1.x with DSO fails (@ Solaris)

1998-12-30 Thread Jan . Wedekind
Hi, UID 0 based processes? Perhaps then you have to run it on ports 8080/8443 temporarily as a regular user to get the core. Without the coredump and a backtrace it's hard to find the location of the SIGSEGV. Thanks for the hint, Ralf. Meanwhile I got some closer and got at least a

Re: FIXED: mod_ssl 2.1.x with DSO fails (@ Solaris)

1998-12-30 Thread Jan . Wedekind
Fixed: recompiled SSLeay with gcc-2.7.2, -O2 -g (previously: without -O2 -g) will check out other combinations tomorrow ... Hi, UID 0 based processes? Perhaps then you have to run it on ports 8080/84= 43 temporarily as a regular user to get the core. Without the coredump and= a

mod_ssl 2.1.x with DSO fails (@ Solaris)

1998-12-29 Thread jan
Hi, sorry for mostly sleeping concerning mod_ssl over the last few weeks (I followed up to 2.1.0 but not afterwards). I just tested mod_ssl DSO support with Solaris 2.5.1, gcc-2.7.2: (tested with 2.1.0, 2.1.1 and 2.1.4) Everything works fine until the first restart (SIGHUP or SIGUSR1) to the