Could anyone please explain what is namebased and what is IP based? What
are the differences and how they work for SSL connections handling?
Can I use the following declaration for Virtual Host declaration with
modSSL? I am having problems with IE Browsers ONLY while connecting from
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to use http 1.1 with modssl? We
want to set up an Apache webserver based on http 1.1 and will be using
ssl-sites with name-based virtual hosts. I know Apache can do this, but
I am not sure if it is supported by modssl.
regards,
Maarten van Lieshout
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 10:21:45AM +0200, Maarten van Lieshout wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to use http 1.1 with modssl? We
want to set up an Apache webserver based on http 1.1 and will be using
ssl-sites with name-based virtual hosts. I know Apache can do this, but
I am
if it is supported by modssl.
HTTP/1.1 works fine with mod_ssl. Name based virtual hosts do not. It has
nothing to do with mod_ssl, though.
http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html#vhosts
thornton
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl
ot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 10:21 AM
Subject: modssl + http-1.1 works?
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to use http 1.1 with modssl? We
want to set up an Apache webserver based on http 1.1 and will be using
ssl-sites with name-based virtual hos
l National Institute for the
Blind,
Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Maarten van Lieshout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 April 2001 09:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: modssl + http
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
owner-modssl-users@ Subject: Re: modssl + http-1.1
works?
Everytime someone posts a "can I do name-based virtual hosting with SSL"
request, I'm inclined to suspect a troll because of the number of replies it
gets. :-) However, I have to make a comment because invariably many of the
replies say something that isn't actually true ...
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001,
Hi there,
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Jeff W. Boote wrote:
The trick is that you have to be able to use a regex for your server's CN in the
server certificate to keep browsers from complaining... This works well for
sites that multiple "related" web sites, but of course doesn't work for the
Geoff Thorpe wrote:
Now *that*'s cool. My only question is: did Microsoft manage to write a
regex
handler into Internet Explorer(s) that works with this sort of thing? If
they
did, I'm frankly (and a little sarcastically) astonished. Do all the
"normal"
browsers support this? Consistently?
PS - Try visiting https://demo.securelook.com/ with your client(s) to see if
the wildcard cert will work for you.
Contrary to Thawte's note about problems with IE on Windows 2000, I have no
issues with the site when I browse it with IE 5.5 on Win2K. I haven't tried
other versions of IE on this
(I don't know if it went out the first time... Sorry if it's a duplicate.)
PS - Try visiting https://demo.securelook.com/ with your client(s) to see if
the wildcard cert will work for you.
Contrary to Thawte's note about problems with IE on Windows 2000, I have no
issues with the site when I
12 matches
Mail list logo
