Clever of you to miss the point entirely. That being to put it in the GetOpt
namespace---the rest is up to the author...
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 7:18 AM
To: Hugh S. Myers
Cc: Martyn J. Pearce; [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hugh S. Myers wrote:
> Getopt::RSE or some variant if you want to people to be able to find it
> easily...
RSE is pretty meaningless in terms of good naming practices. Who would
know what RSE is? GetOpt::StdResource might make sense to more people.
--
Programming is a D
