Re: Another non-free license - PerlBuildSystem

2007-02-19 Thread Smylers
David Kaufman writes: > Hi Ashley! > > Ashley Pond V wrote: > > > Dave Rolsky wrote: > > > > > I don't know the exact rules of CPAN regarding non-free licenses, > > > so I'm not sure if this should be pulled. > > > > > > http://search.cpan.org/dist/PerlBuildSystem/licence.txt > > > > If there

Re: Another non-free license - PerlBuildSystem

2007-02-19 Thread David Kaufman
Hi Ashley! Ashley Pond V wrote: Dave Rolsky wrote: I don't know the exact rules of CPAN regarding non-free licenses, so I'm not sure if this should be pulled. Unlike the Bantown license, it probably doesn't prevent CPAN from distributing it. OTOH, if there were a mirror at a .mil address, this

Re: Another non-free license - PerlBuildSystem

2007-02-19 Thread Fergal Daly
On 19/02/07, imacat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I support the GNU over BSD license, though this is not the subject here. On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:53:38 -0600 Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 16, 2007, at 1:01 PM, Ashley Pond V wrote: >* You, are part or, work for an entity th

Re: Another non-free license - PerlBuildSystem

2007-02-19 Thread Daniel Staal
--As of February 19, 2007 2:15:33 PM +0800, imacat is alleged to have said: Whether the army is good or bad may not be the subject here. But the modern economics system is complex. This kind of treatment against the army is not fair. --As for the rest, it is mine. 'Fair' is not the ques