On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:53 AM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:13:24PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
>
>> I agree that the second point is a problem. I'd like to solve it by
>> delegating to Software::License. Anything it knows about should be a
>> valid ch
* David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-30T12:53:58]
> > I agree that the second point is a problem. I'd like to solve it by
> > delegating to Software::License. Anything it knows about should be a
> > valid choice.
>
> All that does it make it Someone Elses Problem while still not solving
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:13:24PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:17 AM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, in summary, here's my objections to the
> > current 'license' field in META.yml:
> > * poorly documented;
> > * limited range of options for licences;
I guess I can do that, but I think having a 1 liner BUILD subroutine
is simpler than writing an extension to Config::Any.
I'm afraid of starting a YAML vs. The World flamewar, but I don't like
YAML since it differs between white space and tab-created whitespace
and a few other small nuisances with
