On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Bill Ward wrote:
> Do you mean Parse::Method::Signatures ?
>
No, I mean http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?Method::Signatures
http://www.slideshare.net/schwern/methodsignatures-presentation
I haven't looked at it much, but it seems to fill most of your needs
(not tied
Do you mean Parse::Method::Signatures ?
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:54 PM, breno wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Bill Ward wrote:
> >
> > Params::Validate has the right features, but I really don't like the
> > verbosity of its configuration. I was hoping for something more like the
>
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Bill Ward wrote:
>
> Params::Validate has the right features, but I really don't like the
> verbosity of its configuration. I was hoping for something more like the
> Perl prototyping or Getopt::Long syntax. Maybe I'll write a wrapper around
> Params::Validate?
>
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Hans Dieter Pearcey <
hdp.perl.module-auth...@weftsoar.net> wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 08:04:35PM -0700, Bill Ward wrote:
> > I'm not interested in being locked-in to a framework like Moose, so I
> won't
> > even consider those.
>
>
> http://search.cpan.org/~d
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 08:04:35PM -0700, Bill Ward wrote:
> I'm not interested in being locked-in to a framework like Moose, so I won't
> even consider those.
http://search.cpan.org/~drolsky/Moose-0.77/lib/Moose/Util/TypeConstraints.pm#Use_with_Other_Constraint_Modules
Moose's type constraints s
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Tue, 5 May 2009, Bill Ward wrote:
>
> I'm often having to add a half dozen lines of code to every subroutine to
>> perform argument validation and I'd like to offload it once and for all
>> into
>> a CPAN module. Has anyone written or seen
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Hans Dieter Pearcey <
hdp.perl.module-auth...@weftsoar.net> wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 07:51:09PM -0700, Bill Ward wrote:
> > I'm often having to add a half dozen lines of code to every subroutine to
> > perform argument validation and I'd like to offload it o
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Bill Ward wrote:
I'm often having to add a half dozen lines of code to every subroutine to
perform argument validation and I'd like to offload it once and for all into
a CPAN module. Has anyone written or seen such a beast? I haven't, so I've
started writing it... but then,
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 07:51:09PM -0700, Bill Ward wrote:
> I'm often having to add a half dozen lines of code to every subroutine to
> perform argument validation and I'd like to offload it once and for all into a
> CPAN module. Has anyone written or seen such a beast? I haven't, so I've
> star
Is anyone aware of any modules that will check subroutine arguments? I can
think of two similar features of Perl, but neither is quite right:
1. Prototypes (perlsyn) - put something like ($$@) after your subroutine
declaration - but doesn't work for object methods and a few other cases.
Plus, doe
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> Add to this some complication from Module::Install, which also uses
> Makefile.PL. So in that case maybe Makefile.PL is preferred (for
> Module::Install to do its thing) rather than Build.PL. (On the other
> hand, I don't think I've seen module
The way I've interpreted that in my own auto-build scripting is that if
Build.PL exists, the module author is probably a Module::Build user who is
only providing a Makefile.PL grudgingly for the sake of those who haven't
installed Module::Build, and thus I figure that if there's any difference
betw
Hi wise Perl authors:
I've been building some Perl packages for Debian. I've noticed in the
course of this that dh-make-perl (our preferred script for
transforming Perl distributions into Debian packages) prefers
Makefile.PL over Build.PL.
One problem this has caused is that a Makefile is created
Howdy,
> Yikes. You must have missed Test::Number::Delta when you were writing
> that. On CPAN since 2005. I originally called it Test::Float and got
> argued into a proper hierarchical name, which is probably why no one
> seems to know it exists. Synopsis:
No, I saw your module, but I neede
Thanks David. This is a nice module, but overkill for my needs and I'd
rather not make people install more CPAN modules than they have to.
Looks like the key thing is this line:
$ok = abs($p - $q) < $epsilon;
I'll incorporate that bit into my test suite for Number::Format.
On Tue, May
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Jonathan Leto wrote:
> I very much recommend that you look at is_similar() in
> Math::GSL::Test, it has implemented at least a
> few wheels that you are destined to want:
Yikes. You must have missed Test::Number::Delta when you were writing
that. On CPAN since 20
Howdy,
>> It may work, or it may not. If it "works" - in the sense of making the
>> test failure go away - then I would expect it to bite someone later when
>> they just happen to hit upon a number where the floating point rounding
>> error goes the other way.
>>
>> Check that it's in an acceptab
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:02 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 12:23:27PM -0700, Bill Ward wrote:
> > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> > > On 3 May 2009, at 20:07, Bill Ward wrote:
> > >> For my module Number::Format I am getting a strange result from cpan
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 12:23:27PM -0700, Bill Ward wrote:
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> > On 3 May 2009, at 20:07, Bill Ward wrote:
> >> For my module Number::Format I am getting a strange result from cpan
> >> testers that I can't replicate. See this error report...
19 matches
Mail list logo
