Re: Namespace discussion - VMware::LM

2010-02-05 Thread Aditya Ivaturi
> > New root namespaces are not necessarily a bad thing.  Individual modules > with top-level names are discouraged, but e.g. VMware::LabManager would > be just fine. > Ah, I misunderstood that guideline for creating root Namespace. Thanks for clarifying it. --aditya

Re: Namespace discussion - VMware::LM

2010-02-05 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Aditya Ivaturi # on Thursday 04 February 2010 01:39: >WWW::... since it is actually going to use HTTP. It doesn't talk to a single public service hosted on the World Wide Web, so WWW is counter-descriptive. >This way, we don't end up with a new root namespace. New root namespaces are n

Re: Namespace discussion - VMware::LM

2010-02-05 Thread Dana Hudes
Since its a special case of SOAP the SOAP should go before VMWare IMHO. Also it sounds like a network protocol thing rather than a www thing. www implies html not just http. SOAP uses XML. --Original Message-- From: Aditya Ivaturi To: module-authors@perl.org Sent: Feb 4, 2010 4:39 AM Sub