On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 1:56 AM BC wrote:
> The only thing I don't like is that it feels like I am squatting on
> something fairly generic near the top of the name space. If I were to
> push my one and only module down a level as:
>
> Class::Fault::Foobar
>
> would it be a faux pas if there
Thanks to John, David, and Dan for their thoughts on my module naming
question. So to avoid potentially tromping on another author's name
space doing something like:
Class::Error::Foobar
where `Class::Error` already exists, I can avoid the whole problem by
just picking a different but simila
