On 25/07/2024 19:24, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
>Yeah, such an index would remove a lot of the tension between these
different interests, though it wouldn't eliminate all of it. We may
>need to be more proactive with recruiting someone (or some people) to
actually set it up.
I continue to wonder
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 9:45 PM Todd Rinaldo
wrote:
> *From: *Leon Timmermans
> *Date: *Thursday, July 25, 2024 at 2:31 PM
> *To: *Todd Rinaldo
> *Cc: *Philippe Bruhat (BooK) , Russ Allbery <
> ea...@eyrie.org>, module-authors@perl.org
> *Subject: *Re: Guidance on the implications of the Lyon
From: Leon Timmermans
Date: Thursday, July 25, 2024 at 12:13 PM
To: Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
Cc: Russ Allbery , module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Guidance on the implications of the Lyon Amendment
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:49 AM Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
mailto:b...@cpan.org>> wrote:
On Mon, J
From: Leon Timmermans
Date: Thursday, July 25, 2024 at 2:31 PM
To: Todd Rinaldo
Cc: Philippe Bruhat (BooK) , Russ Allbery ,
module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Guidance on the implications of the Lyon Amendment
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:24 PM Todd Rinaldo
mailto:todd.rina...@webpros.com>> w
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:24 PM Todd Rinaldo
wrote:
> I continue to wonder if there’s value in setting this up. Who needs 5.6 or
> 5.8, etc. so desperately that we need to maintain this stream? How do we
> know when they don’t need it?
>
Module::Build::Tiny hasn't been installable on a clean 5.8
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:49 AM Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 07:30:59PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >
> > Some of it makes me wonder if I misunderstood the previous discussions
> and
> > the implications of the Lyon Amendment for the usability of CPAN tools
> and
> > f
