From: Jonas Bromso Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The RT raises an issue with the distribution version number not being
> equal to the one in the main package version, in my case Workflow.pm
>
> I like to be able to release distributions without necessarily
> touching a code module, if changes are j
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Ricardo SIGNES
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-12T18:05:39]
>> Burak Gürsoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Well... You should either rename this thing or advertise more :)
>>
>> And reduce the number of prerequisites, if p
* Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-12T18:05:39]
> Burak Gürsoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well... You should either rename this thing or advertise more :)
>
> And reduce the number of prerequisites, if possible.
If anything, expect more prereqs in the future.
--
rjbs
Burak Gürsoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well... You should either rename this thing or advertise more :)
And reduce the number of prerequisites, if possible.
-- Johan
* Burak Gürsoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-11T14:25:27]
> Well... You should either rename this thing or advertise more :)
I'll advertise more when it's stabler.
--
rjbs
Well... You should either rename this thing or advertise more :)
-Original Message-
From: Ricardo SIGNES [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 1:51 AM
To: module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Distribution version vs. Main package version
* Paul Johnson <[EM
ago on Polytron
PVCS
--Original Message--
From: Ricardo SIGNES
Sender:
To: module-authors@perl.org
Sent: Nov 10, 2008 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: Distribution version vs. Main package version
* Jonas Brømsø Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-10T16:15:20]
> I like to be able t
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 06:50:58PM -0500, Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
> * Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-10T17:17:22]
> > I'm starting to get annoyed by the extraneous commits into the revision
> > control system. And so I'm considering the option of not having the version
> > number in the f
* Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-10T17:17:22]
> I'm starting to get annoyed by the extraneous commits into the revision
> control system. And so I'm considering the option of not having the version
> number in the file that gets checked in, but expanding it for a release.
Using Dist::Z
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 04:43:27PM -0500, Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
> * Jonas Brømsø Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-10T16:15:20]
> > I like to be able to release distributions without necessarily
> > touching a code module, if changes are just documentation, tests or
> > other files. I only u
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Ricardo SIGNES
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jonas Brømsø Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-10T16:15:20]
>> I like to be able to release distributions without necessarily
>> touching a code module, if changes are just documentation, tests or
>> other files. I o
* Jonas Brømsø Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-10T16:15:20]
> I like to be able to release distributions without necessarily
> touching a code module, if changes are just documentation, tests or
> other files. I only update package versions when code/functionality
> changes, so developer
Hello Module Authors,
I have received a RT ticket on my Workflow distribution.
The RT raises an issue with the distribution version number not being
equal to the one in the main package version, in my case Workflow.pm
I like to be able to release distributions without necessarily
touching
13 matches
Mail list logo
