On 25/07/2024 19:24, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
>Yeah, such an index would remove a lot of the tension between these
different interests, though it wouldn't eliminate all of it. We may
>need to be more proactive with recruiting someone (or some people) to
actually set it up.
I continue to wonder
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 9:45 PM Todd Rinaldo
wrote:
> *From: *Leon Timmermans
> *Date: *Thursday, July 25, 2024 at 2:31 PM
> *To: *Todd Rinaldo
> *Cc: *Philippe Bruhat (BooK) , Russ Allbery <
> ea...@eyrie.org>, module-authors@perl.org
> *Subject: *Re: Guidance on
From: Leon Timmermans
Date: Thursday, July 25, 2024 at 12:13 PM
To: Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
Cc: Russ Allbery , module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Guidance on the implications of the Lyon Amendment
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:49 AM Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
mailto:b...@cpan.org>> wrote:
From: Leon Timmermans
Date: Thursday, July 25, 2024 at 2:31 PM
To: Todd Rinaldo
Cc: Philippe Bruhat (BooK) , Russ Allbery ,
module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Guidance on the implications of the Lyon Amendment
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:24 PM Todd Rinaldo
mailto:todd.rina...@webpros.com
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:24 PM Todd Rinaldo
wrote:
> I continue to wonder if there’s value in setting this up. Who needs 5.6 or
> 5.8, etc. so desperately that we need to maintain this stream? How do we
> know when they don’t need it?
>
Module::Build::Tiny hasn't been installable on a clean 5.8
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:49 AM Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 07:30:59PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >
> > Some of it makes me wonder if I misunderstood the previous discussions
> and
> > the implications of the Lyon Amendment for the usability of CPAN tools
> and
> > f
On 16/07/2024 08:58, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote:
During that Toolchain Summit, there were also discussions of per-version
indices for CPAN, so that the CPAN clients could use an index tailored
for specific versions of Perl if the user wants them to. That way, those
who decide to live in the pa
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024, at 3:58 AM, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 07:30:59PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >
> > Some of it makes me wonder if I misunderstood the previous discussions and
> > the implications of the Lyon Amendment for the usability of CPAN tools and
> > for
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 07:30:59PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Some of it makes me wonder if I misunderstood the previous discussions and
> the implications of the Lyon Amendment for the usability of CPAN tools and
> for what prerequisites have to be met before bumping the minimum Perl
> versio
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 4:31 AM Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've started a few conversations in the past year about pushing forward
> the minimum Perl version of podlators, which is a "way upstream" package
> with lots of transitive dependencies. In the v6.0.0 release, I pushed the
> min
Hi folks,
I've started a few conversations in the past year about pushing forward
the minimum Perl version of podlators, which is a "way upstream" package
with lots of transitive dependencies. In the v6.0.0 release, I pushed the
minimum Perl version forward to 5.12.
This broke a release process
11 matches
Mail list logo
