On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:57:28PM -0400, David Golden wrote:
> I think they are quite reasonable. You might also find the
> development version of Devel::CheckLib to be an alternative as as a
> more direct way to check the library even if configure_requires are
> not satisfied. (The dev version
Hello David,
thanks a lot for your quick and helpful reply.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:57:28PM -0400, David Golden wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Lutz Gehlen wrote:
> > My questions are:
> > 1) Do you think that this is in general a good approach to solve my
> > problem.
>
> I think t
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Lutz Gehlen wrote:
> My questions are:
> 1) Do you think that this is in general a good approach to solve my
> problem.
I think they are quite reasonable. You might also find the
development version of Devel::CheckLib to be an alternative as as a
more direct way
Hello everybody,
I am developing the module SVG::Rasterize, which uses the Perl
bindings of the Pango C library. I have got CPAN testers fail
reports that I could track down to the following problem:
The testing system had the right version of the Pango Perl module
(>=1.220), but a too old version
