Re: Proposed module names - DBIx::Class::Simple

2006-03-14 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Jim Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-15 00:10]: >From: "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>DBIx::ORM::Declarative? > >Perfect! Thank you so much. I aim to please. :-) Regards, -- #Aristotle *AUTOLOAD=*_;sub _{s/(.*)::(.*)/print$2,(",$\/"," ")[defined wantarray]/e;$1}; &Just->another->P

Re: Proposed module names - DBIx::Class::Simple

2006-03-14 Thread Jim Schneider
From: "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DBIx::ORM::Declarative? Perfect! Thank you so much.

Re: Proposed module names - DBIx::Class::Simple

2006-03-13 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Jim Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-14 01:05]: >For example, if you have a PERSON table (with PERSON_ID, NAME, >ADDRESS_ID, and EMAIL columns), and an ADDRESS table (with >ADDRESS_ID, LINE1, LINE2, CITY, STATE, ZIP columns (sorry for >the USA-centric example)), your "use" clause would look

Re: Proposed module names - DBIx::Class::Simple

2006-03-13 Thread Jim Schneider
I appologize. I wasn't terribly clear. I was hoping for suggestions as to what name would be appropriate - I'm quite well aware that the names I have are bad. David Landgren wrote: David Golden wrote: Jim Schneider wrote: -- I think you may be best if you come up with your own DBIx::* name