Re: pure perl Zlib

2004-02-16 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-16 11:53]: > (Meanwhile it could emulate the whole API and just return > errors when interfaces it doesn't support are called.) That's an excellent suggestion and nicely resolves the naming issue as a side effect. Very nice. -- Regards, Aristotle "If yo

Re: pure perl Zlib

2004-02-16 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-16 10:14]: > I don't think the other suggested names are appropriate, as > they all deal with Gzip and Gunzip, which > Archive::Zlib(_PP|::Perl) doesn't appear to implement. gzip and zlib use the (exactly) same compression algorithm. The zlib docs m

Re: pure perl Zlib

2004-02-16 Thread khemir nadim
Hi, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Then maybe it needs to mention that it's an emulation, but > besides Compress::Zlib::Emulated anything I come up with needs at > least three words, and those are still incomplete. > > Maybe Compress::Gunzip::ZlibAPI?

Re: pure perl Zlib

2004-02-16 Thread Tim Bunce
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 09:51:18PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 10:43:27AM +1300, Sam Vilain wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:19, Nicholas Clark wrote; > > > > > Autrijus suggested Compress::Zlib::PurePerl, which I think is > > > reasonable. > > > > ...but it doesn'

Re: pure perl Zlib

2004-02-16 Thread unrtst
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-15 22:44]: > > ...but it doesn't use Zlib! :) Compress::Gzip? > > * Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-15 22:53]: > > But it doesn't compress. Compress:Gunzip? > > Uncompress::Gzip (Neither really mean

Re: pure perl Zlib

2004-02-15 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-15 22:44]: > ...but it doesn't use Zlib! :) Compress::Gzip? * Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-15 22:53]: > But it doesn't compress. Compress:Gunzip? > Uncompress::Gzip (Neither really meant as serious suggestions) > > Problem is that it's a

Re: pure perl Zlib

2004-02-15 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 10:43:27AM +1300, Sam Vilain wrote: > On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:19, Nicholas Clark wrote; > > > Autrijus suggested Compress::Zlib::PurePerl, which I think is > > reasonable. > > ...but it doesn't use Zlib! :) Compress::Gzip? But it doesn't compress. Compress:Gunzip? U

Re: pure perl Zlib

2004-02-15 Thread Sam Vilain
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:19, Nicholas Clark wrote; > Autrijus suggested Compress::Zlib::PurePerl, which I think is > reasonable. ...but it doesn't use Zlib! :) Compress::Gzip? -- Sam Vilain, sam /\T vilain |><>T net, PGP key ID: 0x05B52F13 (include my PGP key ID in personal replies to avoid

pure perl Zlib

2004-02-15 Thread Nicholas Clark
Ton Hospel has written a pure perl implementation of gunzip. (no mean feat) Autrijus sent to the PAR list and asked if anyone could refactor it to emulate Compress::Zlib's interface sufficiently to allow Archive::Zip (and therefore PAR) to work with it (to unpack zip files). It seems that the only