On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:19:56 -0400, David Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
At this point, I would suggest the following:
* M::B::Compat be patched to add 'requires 5.XX' when it sees a
'perl' prerequisite (which I've written and will post shortly)
* EU::MM, M::B and the
Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:03:03 -0700, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
David Golden wrote:
Well, EU::MM *cannot* be patched on the clients without
configure_requires. So, the best it could do would be to warn the
author about it at `make dist`
On 7/23/07, David Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/23/07, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you suggeting that ExtUtils::MakeMaker go into Bundle::CPAN?
That's a
very good idea.
While we're at it, ExtUtils::Install, ExtUtils::Command and
ExtUtils::Manifest.
I was thinking it would be a good idea to list outdated CPAN(PLUS) as
conflicts using '=' versions in META.yml. Probably by default.
http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spec-current.html#conflicts
--Eric
--
I eat your socks and you pay me.
--The business sense of a very small goat.
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# from Michael G Schwern
# on Monday 23 July 2007 12:22 am:
That part of the spec is currently written in a contradictory and
implicit manner, the definition of requires, as written, is very
clear that the keys are Perl modules, but that's a simple thing to
fix in the
On Jul 22, 2007, at 11:34 PM, David Golden wrote:
[Patch is against the current SVN head]
This time, test-first development bit me in the a**. Making sense of
compat.t and cleaning it up so I could (a) figure out how to add the
tests I wanted (with and without prerequisites) and (b) keep
