Re: [PATCH] Update Module::Build to 0.31 from CPAN

2009-01-07 Thread David Golden
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Steve Hay wrote: > > # Okay, this is the brute-force method of finding out what kind of > > @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ my %OSTYPES = qw( > >dynixptx Unix > >freebsd Unix > >linux Unix > > - haiku Unix

Ready for 0.3101 release to merge into blead?

2009-01-07 Thread David Golden
Ken -- I tried to be "helpful" sending p5p a patch to merge 0.31 into blead for the 5.10.1. Unfortunately, as per my other email, they went off and patched M::B in blead without pushing it upstream. I just committed the change, bumped versions to 0.3101 and added a Changes note. All that needs t

Re: [PATCH] Update Module::Build to 0.31 from CPAN

2009-01-07 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 10:05:59AM -0500, David Golden wrote: > I think the "problem" is that porters are patching M::B in blead instead of > in the M::B upstream repository, so as M::B development moves forward, the > two sources drift out of sync. The "haiku" line does not appear in the > curre

Re: [PATCH] Update Module::Build to 0.31 from CPAN

2009-01-07 Thread demerphq
2009/1/7 Nicholas Clark : > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 10:05:59AM -0500, David Golden wrote: > >> I think the "problem" is that porters are patching M::B in blead instead of >> in the M::B upstream repository, so as M::B development moves forward, the >> two sources drift out of sync. The "haiku" lin

Re: Ready for 0.3101 release to merge into blead?

2009-01-07 Thread Adam Kennedy
Methinks a nightly cron job to detect differences between core and current CPAN stable and mail a snarky message to p5p? :) Adam K 2009/1/8 David Golden : > Ken -- I tried to be "helpful" sending p5p a patch to merge 0.31 into blead > for the 5.10.1. > > Unfortunately, as per my other email, they